Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7300 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2023
3
18.10.2023
CT No. 15
adeb
W.P.A. 28977 of 2013
Prokash Chandra Maity
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Prashant Agarwal
Mr. Saroj Tulsian
Ms. Jayanti Paul
...for the petitioner
Mr. Pradip Kumar Roy
Mr. Partha Sarathi Pal
Mr. Joydeep Roy
...for the State
Mr. Ankit Sureka
Mr. Biplob Das
...for the respondent nos.
2 and 3 Mr. K.K. Pathak Mr. Souvik Maji Mr. Vijay Verma ...for the respondent nos.
5 and 6
Writ petition is heard in presence of the learned
advocates representing the petitioner, State-respondents,
respondent nos. 2 and 3 and North Suburban Wholesale
Consumers' Co-operative Society Limited. Matter is heard
extensively on the maintainability of the writ petition
under Article 226 of the Constitution.
It has been submitted by Mr. K.K. Pathak, learned
advocate representing the society that relevant provisions
of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Rules, 1987
were applicable to the petitioner and disciplinary
proceeding was initiated in accordance with the said
statutory provisions.
On placing reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble
Division Bench reported in (1990) 2 CHN 284 (Arjed Ali
Gazi Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) and taking into
consideration the submissions made on behalf of the
said society with regard to applicability of the statutory
provisions it is concluded that the present writ petition is
maintainable. However, issue has been raised on behalf
of the society that petitioner has to demonstrate before
this Court that while initiating the disciplinary
proceeding against him there was violation of statutory
provisions. According to the society in strict compliance
of the relevant statutory provisions as contained in the
West Bengal Co-operative Societies Rules, 1987 the
proceeding was concluded which culminated into
issuance of dismissal order against the petitioner.
The learned advocate representing the petitioner
has been posed query with regard to breach of relevant
statutory provisions which prejudiced the petitioner. It is
requested on behalf of the petitioner to adjourn the
matter in order to come prepared to satisfy the query of
the Court.
List the matter under the same heading for further
consideration on 22nd November, 2023.
The learned advocate representing the petitioner is
granted leave to file a copy of the affidavit-in-opposition
used by the society and another copy shall be served
upon the learned advocate for the society by tomorrow,
19th October, 2023.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!