Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7104 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2023
13.10.2023
SL No.33
Court No.8
(gc)
MAT 1530 of 2022
CAN 1 of 2022
Indranarayan Chakraborty
VS
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sanjib Bandopadhyay,
Mr. Biswajit Dutta,
...for the Appellant.
Mr. Amitesh Banerjee,
Mr. Manas Kumar Sadhu,
...for the State.
Ms. S. Kar Ghosh,
Mr. Arabinda Pathak,
...for the Respondent Nos.4,5 & 6.
1. In view of the fact that the petitioner was
not appointed against any sanctioned post,
the benefit of the judgment of Secretary,
State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi
reported at 2006 (4) SCC 1 cannot be
extended to the petitioner.
2. The learned Counsel for the appellant has
relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in State of Karnataka
Vs. M.L. Kesari reported at AIR 2010 SC
2587 to argue that the appointment of the
petitioner is not illegal, it could be
irregular. We are unable to accept the said
submission as he was not appointed
against any sanctioned post.
3. In M.L. Kesari (supra) it has been
categorically stated that where the person
employed possessed the prescribed
qualifications and was working against
sanctioned posts, but had to be selected
without undergoing the process of open
competitive selection, such appointments
are considered to be irregular.
4. In view of the fact that there was no
sanctioned post to which the petitioner
made a claim, the same may not be
applicable to the petitioner.
5. Under such circumstances, we do not find
any reason to interfere with the order
passed by the learned Single Judge.
6. The appeal fails.
7. Accordingly, the appeal and the
application stand dismissed.
8. However, there shall be no order as to
costs.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this
order, if applied for, be given to the parties
on usual undertaking.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!