Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6890 Cal
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2023
09.10.2023 Serial no. 25 [G.S.D]
CRR 2409 of 2023
In the matter of : Ashadulla Biswas @ Asadullah Biswas ... ... Petitioner
Mr. Sobhendu Sekhar Roy Mr. Amarendra Chakraborty
... for the petitioner Mr. Rudradipta Nandy Ms. Manisha Sharma ... for the State
Mr. Roy, ld. Advocate appearing for the petitioner,
has relied upon a judgment which has been delivered for
reference and consideration of a Larger Bench.
Ld. Advocate submits that the issues so canvassed in
the present revisional application are to be decided by the
Larger Bench.
Mr. Nandy, ld. advocate, appearing for the State
submitted a Report. The said report encloses the reasons by
the concerned expert regarding the 290 notes of Rs. 500/-
denomination (FICN) and their categorization as High
Quality Counterfeit FICN.
Let a Photostat copy of the said report be kept with
the record.
Ld. Advocate for the State submits that it has been
decided by the Hon'ble Division bench that, in case, there is
no notification for a Special Court under the UAPA Act to be
constituted, in that case, the Sessions Court, in seisin, of the
matter can continue with the proceedings.
Having considered the issues so canvassed by both
the parties, I am of the view that, hearing in respect of the
points canvassed by either of the parties, are required.
With consent of both the parties, list the revisional
application on 17th of November, 2023, under the heading
"Part-Heard".
Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly
collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court
at Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!