Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3465 Cal
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2023
SAT 397 of 2015 Item-24.
16-05-2023
Madan Mohan Karmakar
sg
Versus
Ct. 8 Shankar Karmakar & Ors.
The appellant is not represented nor any accommodation is
prayed for on behalf of the appellant.
The matter initially appeared in the warning list on 6 th
March, 2023 and thereafter transferred to the regular list on 21 st
March, 2023. There was a clear indication in the list that the
matter shall be transferred to the daily cause list on 21st March,
2023 and since then, the appeal is appearing in the list. In spite of
having due notice and knowledge that the matter is pending, the
appellant is not represented.
The appeal is defective. The defects as mentioned by the
Additional Stamp Reporter dated 20th August, 2015 are considered
and ignored.
The judgment and decree dated 5th May, 2015 passed by the
learned Civil Judge (Senior Divison), 1st Court at Howrah
affirming the judgment and decree dated 23rd December, 2010
passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 6th Court,
Howrah in a suit for declaration of title, is the subject matter of
challenge in this second appeal.
In view of the findings with regard to Title Deed Nos. 3065
dated 17th October, 1977 and 812 dated 31st March, 1980 decided
in the earlier proceeding between the parties, the right to claim
any ownership in respect of the properties is clearly vacated by
res-judicata. In our view, both the courts have rightly applied the
said principle and dismissed the suit on that ground.
The appeal does not involve any substantial question of law
and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. However, there shall be
no order as to costs.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!