Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ct-08 Krishna Prasad Maity vs Ranjit Kumar Maity & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 1939 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1939 Cal
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Ct-08 Krishna Prasad Maity vs Ranjit Kumar Maity & Ors on 23 March, 2023
41      23.03.2023                       SAT 6 of 2015

Ct-08                                 Krishna Prasad Maity
                                              Vs.
                                    Ranjit Kumar Maity & Ors.


ar

The appeal is defective. However, no attempt has been made to remove the defects. The appeal is of the year 2015.

The appeal appeared in the warning list on 6th March, 2023 with a clear indication that the same shall be transferred to the regular list on 21st March, 2023, since then the matter is appearing in the list. The appellant is having deemed notice of the matter.

None appears on behalf of the appellant today.

The defects notified by the stamp reporter in his report dated 16.01.2015 have not yet been removed by the appellant for which we could have dismissed the appeal.

The appellate decree dated 11th August, 2014 is the subject matter of challenge in this second appeal.

We have carefully read the judgment of the first appellate court. The appellant has not filed the certified copy of the judgment of the trial court.

It appears from the judgment of the first appellate court that the suit was held to be barred by limitation under Section 113 of the Limitation Act. The plaintiff did not pray for cancellation of documents, which adversely affected his right, although he is claiming ownership, title and interest over the suit property as real purchaser. The plea of benami transaction was not specifically pleaded. The

suit is otherwise barred by under Section 4 of the Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988. In absence of the appellant, we read the judgment along with the grounds of appeal and did not find any reason to admit the second appeal as it does not involve any substantial question of law.

The appeal accordingly fails.

The second appeal is, therefore, summarily dismissed under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure at the admission stage There will be no order as to costs.

(Uday Kumar,J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter