Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1758 Cal
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2023
FAT 40 of 2023
with
16.03.23 CAN 1 of 2023
Sl.-11
Ct.32 Smt. Sarojini Mondal & Ors.
(S.R.) v.
Sukumar Naskar & Ors.
Mr. Sourav Sen
Mr. Partha Chakraborty
Mr. Mahammad Obaid ... for the appellants.
Mr. Mohan Murari Verma
Ms. Punam Verma
Mr. Abhishek Verma
Mr. Ritobrata Singha Roy
... for the respondent nos.1 & 3.
Leave is granted to the learned advocate on record of
the appellants to make necessary correction in the cause
title of the memorandum of appeal and the application
being CAN 1 of 2023.
The present appeal has been preferred challenging
the judgment and order dated 19th January, 2023 passed
by the Learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court, North
24-Parganas at Barasat in O.S. No.20 of 2006. In
connection with the appeal, an application for stay being
CAN 1 of 2023 has been preferred.
Mr. Sen learned advocate appearing for the
appellants submits that the circumstances surrounding
the execution of the Will are shrouded in suspicion and the
learned Court below did not take into consideration the fact
that the scribe of the Will was not examined. In the said
conspectus, there is every chance of success in the present
appeal.
Mr. Verma, learned advocate appearing for the
plaintiffs/respondents denies and disputes the contention
of Mr. Sen and submits that there is no infirmity in the
judgment impugned.
Heard the learned advocates appearing for the
respective parties and considered the materials on record.
Prima facie, an arguable case has been made out by
the appellants and the denial of the interim order, as
prayed for, may cause severe prejudice to the appellants.
In view thereof, the parties are directed to maintain
status quo as regard the nature, character and possession
of the suit property as on date till the disposal of the
appeal. The parties are further restrained from alienating,
transferring and/or creating any encumbrance upon the
suit property till the disposal of the appeal.
The application being CAN 1 of 2023 is, accordingly,
disposed of.
Let the hearing of the appeal be expedited.
The appellants are directed to put in the requisites
within two weeks for service of notice of appeal upon the
proforma respondents.
As Mr. Verma, learned advocate has entered
appearance on behalf of the respondents, service of notice
of appeal upon the said respondents is dispensed with.
Lower Court records be called for through Special
Messenger at the cost of the appellants. Such cost shall be
deposited within two weeks from date.
Immediately, after arrival of the Lower Court
Records, the office shall examine the same and, if found
complete shall issue notice of arrival of Lower Court
Records to the learned advocate for the appellants.
The appellants are directed to prepare and file
requisite number of informal paper books-printed,
typewritten or cyclostyled, as the case may be out of Court,
within four weeks from the date of service of notice of
arrival of Lower Court Records.
All formalities regarding preparation of paper books
are dispensed with but the learned advocate for the
appellants is directed to incorporate all relevant documents
in the informal paper books.
Liberty to mention for final hearing of the appeal
after filing of the paper books.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!