Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1651 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2023
13.03.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Court No.35 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item no.1 sanjay CRA 513 of 2011
Goutam Gope & Anr.
Vs.
State of West Bengal
Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dawn .... For the appellants.
Mr. Binay Panda, Ms. Puspita Saha ....For the State.
Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate appearing for the
appellants submits that in spite of change of brief in this matter
before appointment of Amicus Curiae to assist the Court, he was
not able to represent the appellants at the time of call, due to
certain compelling circumstances.
He seeks leave so that he may be heard on behalf of the
appellants in this case.
However, there is no scope for grant of such prayer in
view of the fact that in absence of any one representing the
appellants, the Court has proceeded to appoint Amicus Curiae
and has completed hearing of the matter. Today is fixed for
delivery of judgment in the case.
At this stage, Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate
appearing for the appellants is granted liberty to submit written
notes of argument, if any.
In view of the above, delivery of judgment of this matter is
postponed. Matter is still reserved for the judgment.
Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate files written notes of
argument in Court today. Let it be kept with the records.
RAI Digitally signed by RAI
CHATTOPADHYAY
CHATTOPADHY Date: 2023.03.13
AY 16:23:42 +05'30'
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!