Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3846 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2023
Form J(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
WPA 22628 of 2022
Smt. Saraswati Mitra
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sadhan Kumar Halder
Mr. Ashok Kumarn Sarkar
..for the petitioner
Mr. Abhijit Basu
Mr. Arghya Kamal Das
..for the Respondent
Item No.22
Heard & Judgment on: 13.06.2023
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The case of the petitioner in short is that the petitioner is the
wife of one Nimai Mitra, since deceased. The said Nimai Mitra
constituted the partnership firm with Biswajit Kundu, respondent No.6
herein and used to run fair price shop obtaining licence from the
authority. After the death of Nimai Mitra his wife, the petitioner
herein wants to be inducted as a partner in place of her husband.
Hearing was conducted by the Sub-Divisional Controller and the
private respondent No.6 clearly stated that he does not want to carry
on the partnership business with the petitioner because the accounts
of the partnership business has not been settled as yet.
In view of such circumstances, this Court cannot pass any order
directing the Sub-Divisional Controller to induct the name of the
petitioner in the partnership deed because a partnership business is a
creature of contract between two and more persons to run a business
in partnership. In the instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed
for consideration of her representation dated 12 th September, 2022.
If the dealership of fair price shop was issued in the name of the
partnership firm, the present petitioner cannot be permitted to run
the said fair price shop as an individual licensee. Considering such
circumstances, this Court is of the view that the representation
submitted by the petitioner on 12th September, 2022 should be
disposed of by the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 after giving opportunity to
the petitioner and the private respondent No.6 of being heard.
In view of such circumstances, the instant writ petition is
disposed of directing the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to dispose of the
representation dated 12th September, 2022 giving opportunity to both
the petitioner and the private respondent No.6 of hearing within 60
days from the date of communication of the order.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!