Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3738 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2023
June 8, 2023 AD - 35 Ct. 34 SG CRR 1982 of 2023
Pir Zada Imamul Hussain Shah Chisti Al Quadri @ Imamul Hussain
-versus-
The State of West Bengal and another
Mr. Avik Ghatak Mr. Fahad Imam Mr. Shamsher Ansari ... for the petitioner
The petitioner has challenged the judgment and order
dated 04.04.2023 passed by the Chief Judge, City Sessions
Court, Calcutta in Criminal Appeal No.224 of 2022 wherein
the interim order passed by the learned Metropolitan
Magistrate, 15th Court, Calcutta in MISCS Case No.89 of
2020 under the relevant provisions of Protection of Women
(from Domestic Violence) Act was under challenge.
Mr. Ghatak, learned advocate for the petitioner is
aggrieved by the enhancement of maintenance from an
aggregated sum of Rs.4,000/- to an aggregated sum of
Rs.9,000/-.
It is submitted that the foundation of the order was
without any justification by both the courts learned
appellate court as well as the magistrate court. The
petitioner being an Imam has been saddled with such huge
liabilities.
I have considered the submissions advanced by the
learned advocate for the petitioner and on an assessment of
the materials relating to the issues dealt with by the
learned trial court as well as the learned appellate court, I
am of the view that such factual circumstances being
considered by two courts, it would not fit and proper for the
high court to exercise further factual interpretation as the
evidence of the case is awaiting.
The petitioner is granted liberty to canvass the points
advanced in the revisional application along with other
materials to rebut the contentions in affidavit filed by the
wife.
After the final arguments, learned trial court would
consider the same and would arrive at a fresh
consideration at the end of the trial and decide regarding
amendment, modification or enhancement of the amount.
The petitioner prays for increasing the number of
instalments for repaying the arrears as has been directed
by the learned appellate court. Such prayer should be
advanced before the learned trial court and the learned
appellate court. The courts in its wisdom would consider
in the fitness of circumstances. Learned trial court would
also see that trial of the case is concluded as expeditiously
as possible by fixing at least one date in every 60 days so
that the trial ends within a reasonable period of time.
With the aforesaid observations, CRR 1982 of 2023 is
disposed of.
Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed
of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order
duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!