Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3737 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2023
08.06.2023
Item Nos.6&7.
Court No.6.
S. De
M.A.T. 394 of 2023
with
I.A. No. CAN/1/2023
Smt. Soma Karar.
Vs
Howrah Municipal Corporation & Ors.
And
M.A.T. 393 of 2023
Smt. Soma Karar.
Vs
Howrah Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Mr. Partha Pratim Roy,
Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee,
...for the appellant in both
the appeals.
Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee,
Mr. Souvik Das,
Mr. K. Raihan Ahmed,
...for the respondent no.5 in
both the appeals.
Mr. Sandipan Banerjee, Mr. Ankit Sureka, Mr. Sobhan Majumder, ...for the H.M.C.
By consent of the parties, both the appeals and
the connected application are taken up together for
hearing and are disposed of by this common judgment
and order as both the appeals are directed against the
same order.
The judgment and order dated February 8, 2023
which is sought to be impugned in these two appeals,
disposed of two writ petitions being WPA 26649 of
2022 (Sri Sanjoy Samanta Vs. The Howrah Municipal
Corporation & Ors) and WPA 21034 of 2022 (Smt.
Soma Karar Vs. Howrah Municipal corporation & Ors.)
It appears that the Howrah Municipal
Corporation (HMC), at the instance of Sanjoy, passed
an order of demolition of a structure that was put up
by Soma at the concerned premises. Alleging inaction
on the part of HMC in implementing such demolition
order, Sanjoy approached the learned Single Judge
with his writ petition. Soma filed her writ petition
challenging the demolition order.
By the impugned judgment and order Sanjoy's
writ petition was allowed and Soma's writ petition was
dismissed. Hence, these two appeals at the instance
of Soma.
We are told that the demolition order has been
executed. The impugned structure, which Soma
claims, was not a permanent structure, has been
demolished by HMC. Therefore, nothing remains of
these two appeals.
However, this will not prevent Soma from
making appropriate application in accordance with law
to HMC seeking permission to put up any structure
that she may wish to. If such an application is made
by Soma, a copy thereof will be marked to Sanjoy.
HMC shall decide such application in accordance with
law and the applicable rules and regulations after
hearing all concerned parties including Sanjoy.
Since we have not called for affidavits, the
allegations contained in the stay application are
deemed not to be admitted by the respondents.
M.A.T. 394 of 2023 and M.A.T. 393 of 2023
are, accordingly, disposed of along with the application
being I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023.
Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if
applied for, shall be given to the parties as
expeditiously as possible on compliance with all the
necessary formalities.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!