Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1419 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
Present:
The Hon'ble Justice Sugato Majumdar
CS/229/2004
IA NO: GA/3/2005 (Old No: GA/204/2005)
SREEJIT KUMAR TAGORE
VS
RADHA KISHEN BHATTER & ORS.
For the Plaintiff : Mr. Souvik Sen, Advocate,
Mr. Kaustav Chandra Das, Advocate,
Ms. Aditi Dutta, Advocate.
Hearing concluded on : 14.06.2023
Judgment on : 19.06.2023
Sugato Majumdar, J.:
The suit was decreed in terms of order dated 20th March, 2015, in
terms of prayer "A" of the plaint. Plaintiff was held to be entitled to a decree
a sum of Rs.7,34,816/- from the Defendants jointly and severally. Plaintiff
was also held to be entitled to a decree of interests at a rate of 12% per
annum on and from 18th March, 2004 on the principle of sum of
Rs.7,34,816/- against the Defendants jointly and severally. The Plaintiff
Page |2
was also held to be entitled to a decree of costs of Rs.1,50,000/- against the
Defendants jointly and severally. In the selfsame judgment Mr. Kaushik
Choudhuri, Advocate, Bar Library Club was appointed as Special Referee to
inquire into the quantum of mesne-profit from the date of filing of the suit
till the receipt of possession by the Plaintiff.
An application being GA No. 1576 of 2015 was filed at the instance of
Defendant No. 11 praying for recalling of the judgment dated 20th March,
2015. The said judgment was recalled, allowing the application, in terms of
the Order dated 23rd September, 2015.
An appeal was preferred being APO No. 455 of 2015 against the Order
dated 23rd September, 2015. In terms of order dated 7th December, 2017
the Appellate Court set aside the Order dated 23rd September, 2015.
The Special Referee submitted a report on 11th January, 2018 before
this Court. The Defendants 6 and 11 contested the matter. The liberties
were given to them to file an application for exception to the report of the
Special Referee by the Order dated 24th January, 2018. Subsequently, the
Defendant did not appear.
On direction notice of hearing was sent to the Defendants No. 1 - 10
and affidavit of service is in the record.
Page |3
The Report, as of now, of the Special Referee Mr. Kaushik Choudhuri
dated 23/07/2015 is unopposed. It is the conclusion of the report that
a) The amount of Rs.20,13,59,648/- ought to be the
amount of mesne-profit for the period of August 1, 2014 to
April 31, 2015.
b) Mesne-profit for the period beyond April, 2015 ought to
be increased 10% every year till the receipt of the
possession by the Plaintiff.
Let a report accepted with following modifications that
1.
The amount of mesne-profit, as mentioned in (a) above
should be from 01/08/2004 till 31/04/2015.
2. Interest rate mentioned in para (b) above shall be 6% per
annum.
3. The area of the suit property is 69,200 sq.ft. located at 13A
Prasanna Kumar Tagore Street, Kolkata - 700006 which is
one of the prime locations of Kolkata. The Special Referee
took into consideration various factors including market
value. Therefore, the quantum of mesne-profit be accepted
as Rs.20,13,59,648/-.
Page |4
The Defendant No. 1 - 10 shall be jointly and severally liable to pay
the aforesaid amount to the Plaintiff within a period of three months in
default the Plaintiff shall be at liberty to draw up the execution proceeding.
Let the final decree in respect of mesne-profit be drawn up. In case the
Defendants fail to pay the decretal amount within a period of three months
from the date of filing decree, the Plaintiff shall be at liberty to draw up the
execution proceeding.
The suit is disposed of.
(SUGATO MAJUMDAR, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!