Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4566 Cal
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2023
Form No. J(2)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
Present:
The Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
WPA 11724 of 2023
Bharati Biswas & anr.
-vs-
State of West Bengal & ors.
For the Petitioners Ms. Sucharita Biswas
Mr. Debapriya Gupta
For respondent nos.
5&6 Mr. Abhimanyu Bannerjee
Ms. Roshni Kalam
For the State Mr. Amal Kr. Sen, Ld. AGP
Mr. Lal Mohan Basu
Heard on : 31.07.2023
Judgment on : 31.07.2023
Jay Sengupta, J.:
This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities,
especially the respondent no.4 to give necessary police protection at
the premises in question and to take steps on the basis of the
complaint lodged by the petitioners.
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on
record.
Report filed on behalf of the State is also taken on record.
Copies of certain documents pertaining to civil disputes
between the adverse parties as filed on behalf of the private
respondents are also taken on record.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits
as follows. The petitioner no.1 is an octogenarian lady and the
petitioner no.2 is her unmarried daughter. They are purportedly in
possession of a part of the property. Without offering the petitioners
to purchase the particular part of the property in question, the son of
the petitioner no.1 sold away the said part of the property allegedly
to the private respondents. The private respondents are not residing
there. They have employed such anti-social elements who are
residing in the property and creating trouble so that they can grab
the part of the property which is in a possession of the octogenarian
lady. In spite of complaints made before the police authorities, no
adequate steps have been taken. Even the main gate of the building
which was damaged by the private respondents could not be repaired
due to their opposition. Necessary police help may be given for this.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private
respondents relies on the documents filed and submits as follows.
There is a civil suit pending between the parties and the private
respondents have already been granted an order ad interim
injunction in respect of the first floor of the property which they had
purchased after the same had been gifted to the son of the petitioner
no.1. Reliance is also placed on an order passed under Section 144
of the Code in their favour.
At this stage, it is further submitted on behalf of the
petitioners that the purported injunction order passed in the civil
suit has been vacated.
Learned AGP representing the State relies on the report and
submits as follows. Two civil suits are pending between the private
parties over the dispute. On the previous allegations made by the
petitioners, a specific FIR being Lake Town Police Station Case
Number 181/22 dated 27.08.2022 under Sections 448, 427, 188 and
34 of the Indian Penal Code was started. The police are keeping a
watch in the locality.
I have heard the submissions of the learned counsels for the
parties and have perused the writ petition and the documents filed in
course of the proceeding.
It appears that a civil suit is pending between the adverse
parties.
There is also an order passed under Section 144 (2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure.
So far as the question of police inaction is concerned, the
police have already taken steps on the previous complaint lodged by
the petitioner and drawn up a specific FIR. The same is being
investigated into.
In case there is a further disturbance or if the police deems fit
and proper, necessary action may be taken by the police authorities
including starting a proceeding under Section 107 of the Code.
No further order need be passed in this case.
However, the police shall keep a strict vigil at the locale and
ensure that no breach of peace takes place. The police shall also
render necessary protection so that the main gate of the building can
be repaired upon being approached by the petitioners.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the
parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
Since affidavits were not called for, allegations are deemed not
to have been admitted.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
ssi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!