Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4533 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2023
28.07.2023
Ct. 35
Sd. 5. WPA 24420 of 2015
With
CAN 3454 of 2019
Mr. Bikash Chandra Mondal & Ors.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ekramul Bari
Sk. Imtiaz Uddin ..For the petitioners.
Mr. Saikat Chatterjee ..For the State.
Mr. Kumaresh Dalal ..For the School Authority.
At the outset Mr. Bari appearing for the
petitioners has handed over copy of the judgment of
the Hon'ble Division Bench in MAT 369 of 2020 to
submit that the petitioners have taken out CAN 3454
of 2019 in terms of order of the Division Bench, to
pray for release of the outstanding salary of the
petitioners, during the pendency of this case.
It has been submitted further that after grant of
an order of stay by this Court on September 16, 2015
to the impugned office memorandum dated September
8, 2015, and also that dated September 11, 2015, the
respondent authority has continued till the month of
January 2018 to provide petitioners with the salary.
Subsequently, they stopped paying salary to the
petitioners to their utter prejudice and sufferings.
Mr. Bari has vehemently opposed such conduct
of the respondent for stoppage of salary and prays for
release of salary by dint of disposing of CAN 3454 of
2019.
Mr. Chatterjee submits on behalf of the State
that the process of approval of the petitioners is
flouted with mischievousness and illegality. After due
consideration of the facts and circumstances of the
case, the office memorandum as well as the order
dated September 8, 2015 and September 11, 2015
were issued. It has also been pointed out that it was
petitioners' choice previously to withdraw the
contempt application, which they preferred to file
before this Court on the allegation of non-payment of
their salary. It has been urged that the matter may
immediately be heard on merit as the affidavits are
already completed.
Heard submissions. It is not disputed and facts
admitted as of now, that the petitioners are
continuously working in the said school since after
passing of the impugned memorandum and order as
above. It is also admitted fact that this Court's order
dated September 16, 2015 has not been challenged by
the respondents. It has not been disputed that till the
month of January 2018, the petitioners have been
granted salary but not thereafter, though State
disputes that the same has at all not been properly or
duly released.
In view of the circumstances as above, it is
found proper that the respondent authority
immediately releases current salary of the petitioners
with effect from the current English Calendar month.
However, such payment of salary shall be subject to
the final determination of this writ petition with the
undertaking from the petitioners that what they will
receive in the meantime as salary, would be returnable
in case the writ petition does not succeed.
With these directions, CAN 3454 of 2019 is
disposed of.
Post WPA 24420 of 2015 for final hearing, after
two weeks.
Let the matter be marked as part heard.
( Rai Chattopadhyay J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!