Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laila Bewa & Ors vs M/S. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 4520 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4520 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Laila Bewa & Ors vs M/S. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & ... on 28 July, 2023
28.07.2023
 Ct. 654
 D/L 63
   ab

                    IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURIDICTION
                            APPELLATE SIDE

                               FMA 132 of 2023

                              Laila Bewa & Ors.
                                      -Vs-
                    M/s. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.


             Ms. Sima Ghosh
                                     ... for the appellants-claimants

             Mr. Parimal Kumar Pahari
                      ... for the respondent no.1-insurance company

This appeal is preferred against the judgment and

award dated 30th July, 2016 passed by the learned

Additional District Judge-cum-Judge, Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal, 4th Court, Berhampur, Murshidabad

in MAC Case No. 71 of 2013 granting compensation of

Rs. 1,59,500/- together with interest in favour of the

claimants under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles

Act, 1988.

The brief fact of the case is that on 23rd

December, 2012 while the victim and others were

travelling by the offending vehicle bearing registration

No. WB-73A/2407 (Luxury Bus) from Kolkata to

Berhampore at that time the driver of the offending

vehicle lost control and hit a road side tree and

capsized. As a result of the said accident, the victim

sustained severe injuries and was shifted to NRS

Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata where the victim

succumbed to his injuries and died on 25th December,

2012. On account of sudden demise of the victim, the

claimants being the widow, son, two minor sons, one

minor daughter and the mother of the deceased filed

application for compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- under

Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The claimants in order to establish their case

examined two witnesses and produced documents,

which have been marked as Exhibits 1 to 6

respectively.

The respondent no. 1-insurance company did not

adduce any evidence.

By order dated 8th February, 2023, service of

notice of appeal upon the respondent no. 2, owner of

the offending vehicle has been dispensed with since he

did not contest the claim application.

After passing of the award, the appellant no. 6,

Fatema Bewa expired on 10th September, 2016 and by

the aforesaid order passed in CAN 2 of 2022, her name

has been expunged from the memorandum of appeal.

Upon considering the materials on record and the

evidence adduced on behalf of the claimants, the

learned Tribunal granted compensation of Rs.

1,59,500/- together with interest in favour of the

claimants under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles

Act, 1988.

Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the

impugned judgment and award, the claimants have

preferred the present appeal.

Ms. Sima Ghosh, learned advocate for the

appellants-claimants submits that the learned Tribunal

erred in determining the income of the deceased at Rs.

15,000/- per annum whereas it ought to have

determined the income at Rs. 3,000/- per month since

at the time of accident, the victim was a labour under a

mason by profession. In the light of the aforesaid

submissions, she prays for enhancement of the

compensation amount.

Mr. Parimal Kumar Pahari, learned advocate for

the respondent no. 1- insurance company opposes such

prayer for enhancement of the compensation amount.

The only issue raised in the present appeal is

whether the learned Tribunal erred in determining the

income of the deceased.

With regard to the aforesaid issue, it is found that

the learned Tribunal has determined the income at Rs.

15,000/- per annum. However, considering that the

victim was a labour under a mason, monthly income is

determined at Rs. 3,000/- per month.

The other factors have not been challenged in this

appeal.

Bearing in mind the above factors, calculation is

made hereunder:

Calculation of Compensation

Monthly income Rs. 3,000/-

        Annual income                        Rs. 36,000/-
        (Rs. 3,000/- x 12)
        Less: 1/3rd towards personal         Rs. 12,000/-
              and living expenses
                                             Rs. 24,000/-
        Multiplier 15                        Rs. 3,60,000/-
        (Rs. 24,000/- x 15)
        Add: General Damages                 Rs. 9,500/-
            Loss of estate: Rs. 2,500/-
            Loss of consortium: Rs.5,000/-
            Funeral expenses: Rs.2,000/-
        Total compensation                   Rs. 3,69,500/-


Thus, the appellant nos. 1 to 5 (claimants) are

entitled to compensation of Rs. 3,69,500/- together with

interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the

claim application (19.12.2013) till payment.

It is informed that the claimants have already

received the awarded sum of Rs. 1,59,500/- together

with interest in terms of the order of the learned

Tribunal.

Accordingly, the appellant nos. 1 to 5 (claimants)

are entitled to balance amount of compensation of Rs.

2,10,000/- together with interest @ 6% per annum from

the date of filing of the claim application (19.12.2013)

till payment.

The respondent no.1-insurance company is

directed to deposit the balance amount of compensation

and the interest indicated hereinabove by way of a

cheque before the learned Registrar General, High

Court, Calcutta within a period of six weeks from date.

The appellant nos.1 to 5 (claimants) are directed

to deposit ad valorem court fees on the balance amount

of compensation assessed, if not already paid.

Upon deposit of the balance amount of

compensation and the interest indicated hereinabove,

the learned Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta

shall release the aforesaid amount in favour of the

appellant nos.1 to 5 (claimants), after making payment

of Rs. 5,000/- in favour of the appellant no. 1, widow of

the deceased towards spousal consortium, in equal

proportion and upon satisfaction of their identity and

payment of ad valorem Court fees, if not already paid.

The appellant no. 1, being mother and natural

guardian of minor appellant nos. 3, 4 and 5 shall

receive the share of the minors on their behalf and shall

keep the same in a Fixed Deposit Scheme of any

Nationalized Bank or Post Office till attainment of

majority by the said minors.

With the aforesaid observations, the appeal

stands disposed of. The impugned judgment and award

of the learned Tribunal stands modified to the above

extent. No order as to costs.

All the connected applications, if any, stand

disposed of.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Urgent photostat copy of this order, if applied for,

be given to the parties upon compliance of necessary

legal formalities.

( Bivas Pattanayak, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter