Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4469 Cal
Judgement Date : 24 July, 2023
7 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
24.07.2023 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(BM)
Ct 236 APPELLATE SIDE
SA 196 OF 2017
Bijoy Krishna Das
Vs.
Kartick Ghoral & Anr.
Mr. Abir Lal Chakravorti
.... for the appellant.
Mr. Kaushik Sarkar ... for the respondents.
Re: I.A. No.3 of 2021
Affidavit-in-opposition is taken on record.
In a suit for declaration and permanent injunction
filed by the appellant which was dismissed. The plaintiff
made an unsuccessful attempt to get the judgment
reversed before the Learned First Appellate Court. The
second appeal was admitted on 15 th September, 2017 and
two substantial questions of law have been framed.
After admission of the second appeal, direction was
given upon the parties to maintain status quo with regard
to the possession of the suit property till the disposal of
the injunction application.
Heard the learned counsels representing the
parties.
Admittedly, the possession of the suit property is
with the respondents and respondents have undertaken
construction under the Pradhanmanti Awas Yogona. If
the appeal is decided in favour of the appellant /
petitioner, the defendant / respondent may have to face
the consequences.
I do not find any reason to prohibit the
defendants/respondents to carry out the work of
construction but no third party interest shall be created
in respect of the suit property till the disposal of the
appeal. The construction is made by the respondents
may be at their own peril.
I.A. No.3 of 2021 is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this
order duly downloaded from the official website of this
Hon'ble Court.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!