Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1729 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2023
OD-3
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL JURISDICTION(CONTEMPT)
ORIGINAL SIDE
CC 28 OF 2022
WITH
WPO 1423 OF 2021
IN THE MATTR OF:
RANJIT MAJUMDER AND ORS.
VS
SRI VINEET KUMAR, CHAIRMAN AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE
Date : 28th July, 2023.
Appearance:
Mr. Soumya Majumder, Adv.
Mr. Mainak Ganguly, Adv.
For applicants/writ petitioners
Mr. Jishnu Saha, Adv.
Mr. Ashok Kr. Jena, Adv.
Mr. Pranit Bag, Adv.
For alleged contemnor no.1
Mr. D.N. Roy, Adv.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singhania, Adv.
Mr. Raja Satyajit Banerjee, Adv.
Miss Krishnika Chatterjee, Adv.
Miss Sudipta Pramanik, Adv.
For respondent nos. 2 and 3
The Court : The contempt petition arises out of an order dated 7th
February, 2022 as corrected by the order dated 16th February, 2022 passed in
WPO 1423 of 2021. The order under contempt was carried on in appeal by the
Board of Major Port Authority For The Shyama Prasad Mookerjee Port, Kolkata
by filing an appeal being APOT 109 of 2022. The appeal along with the connected
applications filed therein were disposed of by a judgment and order dated 28th
June, 2023.
It is submitted by the petitioners that in view of the recent Special Bench
judgment of this Court since the Appellate Court did not interfere and/or modify
the order under contempt, the contempt application is maintainable before this
Bench.
It is further submitted by the petitioners that the Ministry of Shipping
being the respondent nos. 2 and 3 in the writ petition had by a memo dated 9th
June, 2022 instructed the Chairman, Shyama Prasad Mookerjee Port that the
order under contempt be complied with in the event the appeal fails. A copy of
the said memo dated 9th June, 2022 made over to Court is retained with the
records.
On behalf of Shyama Prasad Mookerjee Port and the alleged contemnor
no.1, it is submitted by Mr. Ashok Kr. Jena, learned advocate that steps are
being taken to comply with the order after the appeal being disposed of without
interfering with the order impugned. However, a decision as to the payment of
arrears to the petitioners are concerned nothing has yet been decided.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Shyama Prasad Mookerjee
Port and the alleged contemnor no.1 are directed to comply with the order and
file an affidavit clearly explaining therein as to any embargo to comply with any
part of the order under contempt.
Let such affidavit be filed by 18th August, 2023; reply, if any, thereto be
filed by 29th August, 2023.
Similarly alleged contemnor nos.2 & 3 are also permitted to use an affidavit
dealing with the situation post disposal of the appeal without interfering with the
order impugned as they have already filed an affidavit. The affidavit-in-opposition
by the alleged contemnors no.2 & 3 be filed by 18th August, 2023; reply, if any,
be filed by 29th August, 2023.
Let this matter appear in the list on 1st September, 2023.
(ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.)
sb/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!