Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 126 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2023
OD -1
ORDER SHEET
WPO/3367/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
SWAPNA KHAITAN
VS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 13th January, 2023.
Appearance:
Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Arijita Ghosh, Adv.
...For the Petitioner
Mr. Tilok Mitra, Adv.
...For the Revenue
The Court: Heard Mr. Khaitan, learned senior counsel appearing for
the petitioner and Mr. Mitra, learned advocate representing the respondent
Income Tax Authority.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order
dated 28th July, 2022, passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act,
1961 on the ground that the same is perverse to the extent on recording in
the aforesaid impugned order that all the materials in the form of enclosure
was furnished to the petitioner along with the notice under Section 148A(b)
of the Act while nowhere it appears from the notice under Section 148A(b) of
the Act that any enclosure was made with the same and on the ground that
respondents could not have proceeded with the impugned proceedings on
the basis of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act in view of the judgment
of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Ors. vs. Ashish
Agarwal reported in 444 ITR 1 SC and instruction no. 01/2022 dated 11th
May, 2022 issued by the CBDT where it has been specifically mentioned
that within 30 days i.e. by 2nd June, 2022, the assessing officer shall provide
to the assessees, in remaining cases the information and material relied
upon for issuance of extended reassessment notices. Admittedly, the
assessing officer has failed to provide the information and material relied
upon for issuance of extended reassessment notices within 2nd June, 2022.
Mr. Mitra, learned Advocate by the order of this Court dated 5th
January, 2023 was asked to produce relevant record to show that any
enclosure was furnished to the petitioner along with the notice under
Section 148A(b) of the Act and as to whether any information and material
relied upon for the issuance of reassessment notice was furnished to the
assessee to which he could not produce any record in denial of the aforesaid
allegation of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am of the
considered view that issues raised in this writ petition deserve final
adjudication upon affidavit-in-opposition by the respondents and I am also
of the considered view that the petitioner has been able to make out a prima
facie case for an interim order.
Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed by the respondents within four
weeks from date. Petitioner to file reply thereto, if any, within three weeks
thereafter. List this matter for hearing on 1st May, 2023.
In the meantime, there will be an interim order of stay of all further
proceedings on the basis of the impugned order dated 28th July, 2022,
under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act till 19th May, 2023 or until
further order whichever is earlier.
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
TR/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!