Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Fultun Bewa & Ors vs The New India Assurance Company ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 873 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 873 Cal
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Fultun Bewa & Ors vs The New India Assurance Company ... on 2 February, 2023
    07
02.02.2023
Ct. No.237
    pg.
                       IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURICTION
                                APPELLATE SIDE

                               FMA 908 of 2008
                                     with
                   IA No. CAN 2 of 2017 (CAN 10792 of 2017)

                              Fultun Bewa & Ors.
                                      Vs.
                  The New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr.


                    Mr. Krishanu Banik
                          ... For the appellants/claimants

                    Ms. Gopa Das Mukherjee
                         ... For the respondent no.1/Insurance Co.


                In re: IA No. CAN 2 of 2017 (CAN 10792 of 2017)

                    This application has been moved with a prayer for

             recording attainment of majority of minor sons of the

             deceased, Asharuddin Sk. @ Ashiruddin Sk., being the

             appellant/claimant nos.2, 3 and 4.


                    Heard both sides.

                    Perused    the   Aadhaar   Cards   of   appellants/

             claimants and the prayer is allowed.


                    Department is directed to make necessary notes in

             the cause title of the Memorandum of Appeal.


                    The application, being CAN 2 of 2017 (CAN 10792

             of 2017), stands disposed of.

                              In re: FMA 908 of 2008


                    This appeal is directed against the judgment and

             award dated 30th August, 2007 passed by the learned
                      2




Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 1st Court, Malda,

in connection with MAC Case No.151 of 1994 whereby the

learned Judge awarded compensation to the tune of

Rs.1,35,000/-.


       The claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor

vehicles Act, 1988 was filed on account of death of one

Asharuddin Sk. @ Ashiruddin Sk. in a motor accident

occurred on 19th December, 1993 at about 3 p.m. by the

involvement of a Mini Truck, bearing registration no.WB-

61/0205. On 19th December, 1993, Asharuddin Sk. @

Ashiruddin Sk. along with other labours went to harvest

paddy at Gazole and at the time of returning home, they

were travelling with a mini truck, bearing registration

no.WB-61/0205.       When   they   were    reached    near

Chitkamahal at about 3 p.m., the said truck lost its

control over the vehicle which capsized. As a result,

Asharuddin Sk. @ Ashiruddin Sk. died on spot. After the

accident Gazole Police Station Case No.73 of 1993 dated

19th December, 1993 under Sections 279/338/304A of the

Indian Penal Code was started and ended with charge

sheet against the driver of the mini truck. That is why the

claim petition was filed with a prayer for compensation to

the tune of Rs.1,80,000/- in terms of the age of the

deceased as 32 years having income of Rs.1,000/- per

month as a labour.


       Both the owner of the offending vehicle and the

Insurance Company of the vehicles contested the claim
                      3




petition by filing their respective written statements

denying all material allegations of the claim petition

contending, inter alia, that the claimants are not entitled

to any compensation, as prayed for.


        To   prove   the   case,   claimants   examined    two

witnesses, i.e., wife of the deceased as PW-1 who

corroborated the entire contents of the claim petition and

also testified in    the   same    tune   during   her   cross-

examination. One Md. Taimur Hossain examined as PW-2,

who claimed himself to be the eyewitness of the incident,

testified that on 19th December, 1993 he was standing at

Chitkamahal Bus Stand, he found a mini truck, bearing

registration no.WB-61/0205, coming from Gazole side

towards Malda at a very high speed and suddenly capsized

near the said Chitkamahal Bus Stand. Some persons were

travelling in the vehicle, including Asharuddin Sk. @

Ashiruddin Sk. who died on spot. In cross-examination, he

further corroborated by saying that Asharuddin Sk. @

Ashiruddin Sk. died in the accident and others received

injuries.


        In course of their evidence, certified copy of First

Information Report, post-mortem report and accident

information report were admitted in evidence as Exhibit 1

to 4. It is further seen from the record that on behalf of the

claimants, one photocopy of the insurance policy has also

been filed in respect of the vehicle, bearing registration

no.WB-61/0205.
                     4




       After careful perusal of the entire materials on

record, it is found that the learned Tribunal assessed the

compensation at Rs.1,35,000/- and the owner of the

vehicle was asked to pay the compensation to the

claimants.


       Mr. Krishanu Banik, learned advocate, appearing

on behalf of the appellants/claimants has submitted that

he has preferred this appeal mainly on two grounds. One

is that the appellants/claimants are also entitled to future

prospect of 40% in terms of age of the deceased as well as

general damages of Rs.70,000/- in view of the principles

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sarala Verma

(Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.

reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121 as well as in the case of

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi & Ors.

reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680 = 2017 ACJ 2700.


       That apart, Mr. Banik has further contended that

the Insurance Company has initial liability to pay the

entire compensation to the appellants/claimants and to

recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.


       In opposition, Ms. Gopa Das Mukherjee, learned

advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/

New India Assurance Company Limited has supported the

judgment passed by the learned Tribunal.


       The judgment passed by the learned Tribunal

reflects that the learned Tribunal assessed the monthly
                        5




income of Rs.1,000/- and after applying multiplier 16

rightly, assessed compensation at Rs.1,28,000/- along

with Rs.2,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs.5,000/-

towards loss of consortium, totaling Rs.1,35,000/-. But, in

view of the principle laid down in Sarala Verma (supra) as

well as Pranay Sethi (supra), I have no other option but to

add future prospect of 40% of income in terms of age of

the deceased as well as general damages of Rs.70,000/-.

That apart, learned Tribunal deducted 1/3rd of the income

towards personal expenses instead of 1/4th in terms of

family members of the deceased.


        In the aforesaid view of the matter, I propose to

modify the award as follows:-


  Monthly Income                                Rs. 1,000/-

  Annual Income (Rs.1,000/- x 12)               Rs. 12,000/-

  Add: Future prospect 40%                      Rs. 4,800/-
                                                -------------------

Rs. 16,800/-

Less: 1/4th Deduction (personal expenses) Rs. 4,200/-

-------------------

Rs. 12,600/-

Multiplier by 16 (as per age of the victim) X 16 Rs.2,01,600/-

Add: General Damages Rs. 70,000/-

------------------

Total Rs.2,71,600/-

-------------------

In the aforesaid view of the matter, the appellants

claimants are entitled to the compensation to the tune of

Rs.2,71,600/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from

the date of filing of the claim petition, i.e., on 16th

December, 1994 till the deposit of the same.

Accordingly, the respondent no.1/New India

Assurance Company Limited is directed to deposit the

compensation amount of Rs.2,71,600/- along with interest

@ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim

petition, i.e. on 16th December, 1994 till the actual deposit

of the amount before the office of the learned Registrar

General of this Court, within six weeks from the date of

this order.

The respondent no.1/New India Assurance

Company Limited is at liberty to recover the entire

awarded sum with interest from the owner of the vehicle,

bearing registration no. WB-61/0205, through execution

proceeding in terms of the observations of the Hon'ble

Apex Court in Shamanna & Ors. v. The Divisional

Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

reported in AIR 2018 SC 3726 and Oriental Insurance

Co. Ltd. v. Nanjappan & Ors. AIR 2004 SC 1630 : (2004)

13 SCC 244.

The appellants/claimants are entitled to withdraw

the awarded amount with interest, subject to payment of

additional ad valorem court fees on the amount of

Rs.91,600/- (Rs.2,71,600/- - Rs.1,80,000/-) before the

learned Tribunal.

The learned Registrar General is requested to

disburse the amount to the appellants/claimants in equal

share on proper identification as the minors have already

attained majority by lapse of time.

With the observation, the appeal, being FMA 908 of

2008, stands disposed of.

All pending applications, if there be any, stand

disposed of.

Records of the learned Tribunal along with a copy

of this order be transmitted back immediately.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of

necessary formalities.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter