Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Swagata Roy Dey vs Sri Deborshi Roy
2023 Latest Caselaw 1049 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1049 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Smt. Swagata Roy Dey vs Sri Deborshi Roy on 8 February, 2023

8.2.2023

Ct. no. 652 sb C.O. 1164 of 2022

Smt. Swagata Roy Dey Vs.

Sri Deborshi Roy

Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee Mr. Shibasis Chatterjee Mr. Debdutta Pathak ...for the petitioner

Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Chakraborty ...for the opposite party

Affidavit-in-reply filed by the petitioner is taken on

record.

This is an application under Section 24 of the Code

of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of the Matrimonial

suit being no. 280 of 2017 pending before the court of

learned District Judge, Berhampore, Murshidabad to the

court of learned Additional District Judge, Barrackpore,

North 24 parganas.

The petitioner contended that the petitioner was

married with the opposite party on 29th January, 2015

according to Hindu Rites and Customs. The parties are

blessed with a male child. The petitioner alleged that she

was driven out from her matrimonial home and she had

to take shelter at his father's work place at Berhampore.

Subsequently, after his father's superannuation, she

along with her child, shifted to her father's

accommodation at Kharda within the jurisdiction of

Barrackpore court where she is residing along with her

child. Aforesaid suit for restitution of conjugal rights,

filed by the opposite party/husband against the

petitioner/wife is pending in the court of learned District

Judge, Berhampore, Murshidabad which situates at a

distance of about 179 kilometres from the petitioner's

present residence. The petitioner further submits that in

order to attend the said proceeding at Berhampore, the

petitioner has to take rickshaw to Sodepur station and

from there she has to board a local train to reach

Ranaghat station. From there she has to board another

train to reach Berhampore station, which takes almost

four hours and she has to return on the same day. She

has no accommodation nor she has any relative at

Berhampore and a single day's journey involves a cost of

Rs. 600/-. The petitioner is accordingly facing extreme

inconvenience to attend the said proceeding at

Berhampore. Accordingly, the petitioner has prayed for

aforesaid transfer.

Learned counsel for the opposite party raised

objection and contended that the opposite party is now

posted in a responsible post in the District office at

Berhampore and if the prayer for transfer is allowed,

then it will be inconvenient for him to attend the said

proceeding as he will not be allowed to take leave on

every occasion. Considering the convenience for both the

parties, learned counsel for the opposite party suggests

that the case may be transferred to such a court, which

situates at a mid point of the two stations so that neither

party will face any inconvenience.

In view of the judgment reported in N.C.V.

Aishwarya Vs. A.R. Saravana Karthik Sha (2022 Live Law

(SC) 627, the cardinal principle for exercise of power

under Section 24 of the Code is that the ends of justice

demands the transfer of suit. It is also settled position of

law that under the prevailing socio-economic paradism in

the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience

which must be looked at while considering transfer.

Considered the balance of convenience and

inconvenience of the parties and economic soundness of

both the parties and that petitioner is custodian of a

school going child and also the disatnce involved in

between the two stations and also in view of settled

position of law, which learns in favour of petitioner/wife

and also the social strata of the parties, I am of the

considered opinion that if the case is transferred from

where it is pending to the court of learned Additional

District Judge, Ranaghat, neither party will have a cause

to prejudice.

Learned District Judge, Berhampore, Murshidabad

is hereby directed to withdraw the Matrimonial suit

being no. 280 of 2017 pending before the court of

learned District Judge, Berhampore, Murshidabad and

to transmit the same to the court of learned District

Judge, Nadia at Krishnagar within a period of three

weeks from the date of communication of the order, who

in turn will transfer the same to the court of learned

Additional District Judge Ranaghat having jurisdiction to

try the suit within a period of three weeks thereafter.

The transferee court shall serve fresh notice upon

both the parties intimating the next date of hearing

before proceeding further with the aforesaid suit and

learned transferee court will continue the proceeding at

the stage where it reached till date.

The department is directed to send a copy of the

order to the learned District Judge, Berhampore,

Murshidabad and learned District Judge, Nadia at

Krishnagar immediately.

Accordingly, C.O. 1164 of 2022 is disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly

applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all

requisite formalities.

(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter