Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5535 Cal
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2023
Form J(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
WPA 27144 of 2016
Paschim Medinipur Bhumij Kalyan Samity and Anr.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Pradip Kumar Roy
Mr. Tirthajit Roy Chowdhury
..for the petitioners
Mr. Rajarshe Basu
Mr. Safik Dewan
..for the State
Item No.22.
Heard & Judgment on: 24.08.2023
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The petitioner is a registered society of a tribal community
commonly called 'Bhumij Community'. They are residents of village
Abhaya within P.S. Salbani. It is the case of the petitioner society that
the members of 'Bhumij Community' used two ponds lying in the said
village for the purpose of their daily works such as cleaning utensils,
taking bath and also by psyculture. The petitioner No.2 being the
Secretary of the petitioner No. 1 Society made a representation
before the District Magistrate, Paschim Medinipur with a prayer to
settle the said two ponds in favour of the Society being the
representative of 'Bhumij Community' so that they can use the said
ponds bot for their life and livelihood. However, the District
Magistrate, Paschim Medinipur failed and neglected to consider the
said representation dated 26th June, 2014 till date.
So, the instant writ petition.
It is frankly and fairly submitted by the learned advocate for the
State respondents that the said two ponds are presently recorded in
Khatian No.1 meaning thereby. The said two ponds are under the
ownership of the State Government. Therefore, the District Magistrate
and Collector is the competent authority to consider the
representation dated 26th June, 2014 in accordance with law.
In view of such submission the instant writ petition is disposed
of directing the District Magistrate, Paschim Medinipur to consider the
representation submitted by the petitioner No.2 as representatives of
'Bhumij Community' living at Abhaya within P.S. Salbani and
Secretary of the petitioner No.1 Society under the provision of the
West Bengal Inland Fisheries Act, 1984 and Rules thereof. Such
representation shall be disposed of preferably within 90 days after
giving an opportunity to the petitioner No.2 of hearing and to
communicate the order to the petitioner.
Since no affidavit has been called for, the averment made by
the petitioner in the writ petition remains uncontroverted.
There shall be, however, no order as to costs.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!