Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5116 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2023
17.08.2023 Sl. No.7(DL) srm
C.O. No. 1568 of 2023
Smt. Laxmi Debi Gupta (Goel)
Versus
Sri Anup Kumar Kundu & Ors.
Mr. Arijit Sarkar, Ms. Prajaaini Das ...for the Petitioner.
Mr. Aritra Basu, Ms. Anshumala Bansal, Ms. Prarthan Singha Roy ...for the Opposite Parties.
The revisional application has become infructuous in
view of the subsequent orders passed by the learned Civil
Judge (Junior Division), Bidhannagar, North 24-Parganas, in
Title Execution Case No.02 of 2021.
It appears that on an application under Rule 208 of the
Civil Rules and Orders, police help was granted to the decree-
holder to take possession of the property. The said order is
under challenge before this Court.
It is submitted that the possession has been taken by the
decree-holder. The property has been demolished.
The application filed by the judgment-debtor for an
injunction restraining demolition has been rejected and the
application for stay of all further proceedings in execution case
has also been rejected.
It is also submitted that an application under Order IX
Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed for
setting aside the ex parte decree and a first appeal has also been
filed against the said ex parte decree.
The petitioner is at liberty to pray for necessary interim
orders before the appropriate court. Further, the petitioner's
remedies under the Civil Procedure Code under such fact
situation are left open.
Although, this Court is of the view that the application
under Rule 208 was not the proper course available to the
decree-holder seeking police help for execution of the decree
but at this stage, when further developments have taken place
and the decree-holder has taken possession, the question of
setting aside such order and granting an interim protection
would not arise. The petitioner will have to approach the
appropriate forum for necessary reliefs. If any application is
filed seeking protection of the property to the effect that third
party interests are not created till the lis is decided, such
application shall be taken up and disposed of by the learned
court below.
The revisional application is disposed of without any
interference.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Parties are to act on the basis of the server copy of this
order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!