Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Palash Samanta & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 2505 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2505 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Palash Samanta & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 12 April, 2023
12.    12.04.2023
       Court No.6
      Tanmoy Ghosh


                                         MAT 240 of 2023

                                     Palash Samanta & Anr.
                                             -Versus-
                                 The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                                               With
                                       IA No: CAN/1/2023



                          Mr. Bhudeb Chatterjee, Adv.,
                          Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, Adv.,
                          Ms. Somosree Saha, Adv.,
                          Mr. Dip J. Chakrabarty, Adv.,
                          Ms. Rama Chakrabarty, Adv.
                                              ...for the appellants.

                          Mr. Chandi Charan De, Ld. AGP,
                          Ms. Reshmi Rehman, Adv.
                                              ...for the State.

                          Mr. Nirmalendu Patra, Adv.,
                          Mr. Debnarayan Patra, Adv.
                                              ...for the respondent no.8/

writ petitioner.

By consent of the appearing parties, the appeal and

the connected application are taken up together for

hearing.

A judgment and order dated January 17, 2023,

whereby WPA 20597 of 2022 was disposed of by a

learned Single Judge, is the subject-matter of challenge

in this appeal.

The writ petition was filed by the respondent no.8

before us. The appellants were two of the private

respondents in the writ petition.

It was contended by the writ petitioner before the

learned Single Judge that the private respondents in the

writ petition have raised unauthorized construction

upon encroaching on PWD road adjoining to the writ

petitioner's property, thereby obstructing his egress from

and ingress to the property. It appears that the writ

petitioner had submitted a representation before the

concerned Authority. Pursuant to the same, the

Assistant Engineer, PWD, Contai Sub-Division, by a

letter dated August 2, 2022, requested the concerned

Block Land and Land Reforms Officer (BL&LRO) to take

necessary steps for demarcation of the PWD land.

The private respondents submitted before the

learned Single Judge that they have not encroached

upon any portion of PWD land. They have been granted

licence by Contai Municipality to carry on business on

the plot where they carry on business. The plot belongs

to the Municipality.

The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ

petition with the following directions:-

"Upon consideration of the submissions made on behalf of the parties, the writ petition being WPA 20597 of 2022 is disposed of directing the 7th respondent to complete the demarcation of the plot in question as indicated in the letter issued on 2nd August, 2022 by the Assistant Engineer, PWD Contai Sub-Division within one month from date and submit a report thereof before the 3rd respondent accordingly. In the event encroachment/ obstruction on PWD land is detected upon demarcation, the 3rd respondent is directed to initiate proceeding under Section 10 of the West Bengal Highways Act, 1964 and take the proceeding to its logical conclusion within two months from the date of receipt of the report upon affording

reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the interested persons including the petitioner and the private respondents, in accordance with law.

Since the private respondents claim that they have been issued licence by the Contai Municipality, the Contai Municipality should also be given an opportunity of hearing before the concerned authority."

Being aggrieved, two of the private respondents

have come up by way of this appeal.

It is submitted on behalf of the appellants that they

have in their possession documents, which would

indicate that they carry on business from the Municipal

land under licence granted by the Municipality. There is

absolutely no encroachment on PWD land. Hence, the

question of initiation of proceedings under Section 10 of

the West Bengal Highways Act, 1964, does not arise.

Further, the Municipality was not made a party to the

writ petition. Learned Counsel submitted that had

direction been given for exchange of affidavits, the

documents in support of the contention of the appellants

would have been brought on record before the learned

Single Judge.

Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, we

are of the opinion that the writ petition should be

decided afresh after exchange of affidavits. We also feel

that Contai Municipality should be impleaded as a

party-respondent to the writ petition. Accordingly, we

implead Contai Municipality through its Chairperson, as

a respondent in the writ petition.

Learned Advocate-on-Record for the writ petitioner

will make necessary amendment in the cause title of the

writ petition and service of the writ petition will be

effected on the Municipality along with a copy of this

order within a fortnight from date

The respondents in the writ petition will be at

liberty to file affidavit-in-opposition before the learned

Single Judge within four (4) weeks from date. Reply

thereto, if any, be filed within a week thereafter. The

parties will be at liberty to make appropriate prayer for

hearing of the writ petition before the learned Single

Judge having determination in the matter, after

exchange of affidavits or after the time for filing of

affidavits has expired.

The order under appeal is set aside.

However, we clarify that we have not gone into the

merits of the case at all. We request the learned Single

Judge to decide the writ petition on merits upon

exchange of affidavits.

Since we have not called for affidavits, the

allegations in the stay petition shall be deemed not to

have been admitted by the respondents.

The appeal being MAT 240 of 2023 and the

connected application being IA No: CAN/1/2023 are

disposed of.

Let urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be made available to the parties, upon

compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter