Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2239 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2023
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
IA No: CRAN/1/2023
In
C.R.R. 190 of 2023
Md Sohrab
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
For the petitioner : Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Amitava Ray, Adv
Ms. Sofia Nesar, Adv.
Mr. Santanu Sett, Adv.
For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Anurag Bagaria, Adv.
Mr. Vijay Verma, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Imran Ali, Adv.
Ms. Debjani Sahu, Adv.
Heard on : 03.04.2023.
Judgment On : 03.04.2023.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
Jorasanko Police Station Case No.281 dated 26 th October, 2019
was registered against the petitioner under Sections
120B/288/420/406/468/471/471A of the Indian Penal Code. The said
case is pending before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Calcutta. The accused / petitioner approached this Court
by filing the instant revision to quash the above-mentioned
proceeding pending in the Trial Court.
During the pendency of the instant revision, the parties have
settled the dispute amicably out of Court. A joint petition for
compromise has been filed. On the last occasion the learned Public
Prosecutor-in-Charge was requested to direct the concerned police
officer to record the statement of the de-facto complainant to
ascertain as to whether such compromise has been made voluntarily
and willingly by the de-facto complainant without any threat, fear or
undue influence. The Investigating Officer has submitted a report
along with statement of the de-facto complainant.
It appears from the record that the de-facto complainant
amicably has settled the dispute with the accused/petitioner. The
allegation made in the complaint is absolutely private in nature.
Therefore, relying on the principles laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir's case, this Court accept the
settlement under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In view of such circumstances, further proceeding in connection
with Jorasanko Police Station Case No.281 dated 26 th October, 2019
against the petitioner be quashed.
The learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta is
directed to pass necessary order discharging the accused from the
case.
The revisional application along with connected application are
disposed of accordingly.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Mithun De/ A.R. (Ct).
Sl No.05.
D/L.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!