Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6840 Cal
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2022
22.09.2022 Item No.15 Suman Ct.42
CRR 3248 of 2022
Sri Amresh Singh Kharwar @ Guddu Vs.
State of West Bengal and Anr.
Mr. Arun Maity Mr. Manabendranath Bandyopadhyay Mr. S. Sadhukhan ...for the petitioner
Opposite party No.2 is the wife of the petitioner.
On or about 18th August, 2015 the opposite party No.2
filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence Act before the learned
Judicial Magistrate, 7th Court at Howrah praying for
monetary as well as other reliefs. The prayer was also
made for interim relief under Section 23 of the said Act.
The said proceeding was registered as Misc. Case
No.577 of 2015. In the said proceeding the learned
Magistrate passed an order of interim monetary relief on
7th February, 2018 directing the present petitioner
/husband to pay monetary relief at the rate of
Rs.7,000/- for the opposite party No.2 and Rs.3,000/-
for their minor child total being Rs.10,000/- per month.
The husband /petitioner challenged the said order
passed under Section 23 of the said Act by filing
Criminal Appeal No.39 of 2018 under Section 29 of the
said Act. The said appeal was dismissed on contest by
a judgment dated 13th December, 2018. In the
meantime, marital tie between the petitioner and the
opposite party No.2 was dissolved by a decree of
dissolution of marriage in Mat. Suit No.920 of 2015 vide
judgment and decree dated 7th December, 2019. The
opposite party No.2 filed a complaint under Section
498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 /
4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act before the jurisdictional
police over which ACGR Case No.4211 of 2015 was
registered. The said criminal case was disposed of on
14th June, 2022 recording an order of acquittal in favour
of the petitioner and other accused persons.
It is the grievance of the petitioner, that though
marriage of the petitioner with the opposite party No.2
was dissolved by a decree of divorce and the opposite
party No.2 has already married for the 2nd time, she has
been continuing Execution Case No.98 of 2019 to realize
arrear monetary relief against the petitioner. At the
same time, the opposite party No.2 has been going on
taking adjournments in Misc Case No.577 of 2015.
Under such factual background, the petitioner has
challenged legality, validity of the order dated 3rd
February, 2022 passed by the learned Judicial
Magistrate, 7th Court at Howrah in Misc Execution Case
No.98 of 2019 directing issuance of warrant of arrest
against the petitioner and subsequently order dated 11th
August, 2022 directing the Police Authority to execute
the warrant of arrest against the petitioner.
The instant revision be admitted for hearing. The
petitioner is directed to issue notice upon the opposite
party No.2 under registered speed post with AD and file
affidavit-of-service within three weeks after vacation.
In the mean time, the impugned orders dated 3rd
February, 2022 and 11th August, 2022 be stayed till 31st
December, 2022 subject to depositing a sum of
Rs.80,000/- in the executing court by the petitioner
within 30th September, 2022 in the name of the
opposite party No.2, without prejudice.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!