Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6635 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2022
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
CRR 3496 of 2022
Astha Kanodia
Vs.
State of West Bengal and Anr.
Mr. Subhrojyoti Bhowmick
...for the petitioner
Item No.213
Heard & Judgment on: 15.09.2022
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The petitioner is a destitute wife of the private opposite party.
For her maintenance she filed two proceedings - one under Section
125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and another under Section 12
read with other cognate provisions of the Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act alleging, inter alia, that the Bench clerk
attached to the 1st Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Sealdah
in collusion with the private opposite party or his learned advocate
had been fixing the dates in the said proceedings after a long gap and
thereby the petitioner is not getting even any interim relief in the said
proceedings for the last three years.
By an order dated 25th August, 2022 the learned Judicial
Magistrate, 1st Court at Sealdah released the case No.M/23 of 2021
from his file after receiving such allegation against the Bench clerk of
the said Court and sent a letter to the Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Sealdah requesting him to transfer the record of M/23 of
2021 from his Court to any other Court having jurisdiction.
The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sealdah did not
take any action over such letter on the ground that only the Chief
Judicial Magistrate at Alipore has the power under Section 410 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure to transfer a case pending in the file of a
Judicial Magistrate to another Court.
The petitioner has approached this Court assailing the order
dated 25th August, 2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1 st
Court at Sealdah.
On perusal of the order it is ascertained that the learned Judicial
Magistrate, 1st Court at Sealdah was of the opinion that for ends of
justice it would not be proper to take up her M/23 of 2021 filed by the
petitioner as the petitioner has made a specific allegation against the
Bench clerk attached to the said Court.
On perusal of the order dated 25th August, 2022 I do not find
any apparent error in the said order. The learned Judicial Magistrate,
1st Court at Sealdah recused himself from entertaining the aforesaid
case because if any other order was passed against the petitioner it
would have been a telling effect in the mind of the petitioner that she
has been prejudiced.
Therefore, I do not find any merit in the instant revision and the
same is liable to be dismissed.
Proper course of action in the instant matter is by filing an
application under Section 410 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by
the petitioner before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore
praying for transfer of the said case.
In order to enable the petitioner to take such step as proposed
hereinabove the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the certified copy
of the impugned order replacing the same with a photostat copy of
the order.
If any such application is filed by the petitioner before the
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore, the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate shall take all endeavour to dispose of the said application
before coming winter vacation.
The instant revision is, thus, disposed of.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!