Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6631 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2022
Dl. September
10. 15, 2022 S.A. 29 of 2022
Jagdish Chandra Majumdar
Vs.
Smt. Arati Bala Seal & anr.
The appellant is not represented, nor any
accommodation is prayed on his behalf.
The appeal was earlier listed on October 1, 2021, but
none had appeared on behalf of the appellant to move the appeal for
admission. Thereafter the matter was again appearing in the list
since September 7, 2022. We, however, propose to decide the
question of admission of the present second appeal on the basis of
the materials available on record.
The judgment and decree of affirmation dated
November 28, 2005 passed by the learned Judge, Seventh Bench,
City Civil Court at Calcutta, in Title Appeal No. 93 of 2004 arising
out of judgment and decree dated August 30, 2004 passed by the
learned Judge, Second Bench, Small Causes Court at Kolkata, in
Ejectment Suit No. 1341 of 2000 is the subject matter of challenge
in this appeal.
There is a clear finding of fact by the first appellate
court as well as by the trial court with regard to the reasonable
requirement of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit premises. The said
finding is based on cogent evidence.
In view thereof, we do not find any reason to interfere
with the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by both the courts
below. Moreover, we find no substantial question of law involved in
this appeal for which the same is required to be admitted.
The second appeal is, therefore, summarily dismissed
under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, nothing remains to
be decided in the connected application for stay filed under CAN
3200 of 2006 and the same is also dismissed.
There will be no order as to costs.
( Soumen Sen, J. )
dns ( Uday Kumar, J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!