Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6445 Cal
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2022
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
CRR 3167 of 2022
Durga Garodia and others
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Sourav Chatterjee
Ms. Subhasree Patel
Ms. Saini Das
..for the petitioners
Ms. Baisali Basu
...for the State
Item No.164ML
Heard & Judgment on: 09.09.2022
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The petitioner No.3 is the husband and remaining petitioners
are matrimonial relations of the opposite party No.2.
Indisputably, marriage of the opposite party No.2 was
solemnized with the petitioner on 15 th February, 2015. Immediately
after marriage she conceived some time in the month of June, 2015.
It appears from the medical report of the opposite party No.2, copy of
which has been annexed with the instant revision that the opposite
party No.2 went on abortion voluntarily at ILS Hospitals, Salt Lake on
17th July, 2015. She was aborted. Subsequently, on 22 nd December,
2018 the opposite party No.2 gave birth to a child under the wedlock
between her and the petitioner No.3. She again conceived sometimes
in the month of February, 2021. The opposite party No.2 decided
voluntarily to terminate her pregnancy and it was terminated by Dr.
Gitasree Mukherji attached to Bhagirathi Neotia, Woman & Child Care
Centre on 23rd February, 2021. Subsequently, there was marital
discord. The opposite party No.2 filed an application under the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act before the
competent Court of the learned Magistrate on 16 th December, 2021.
In the said proceeding she did not make any allegation that she was
forcibly terminated. Subsequently, on 13 th May, 2022 she lodged a
complaint before Golf Green Police Station against the petiitioners
alleging offence under Sections 498A/406/313/34 of the Indian Penal
Code against the petitioners. It is submitted on behalf of the
petitioners that when the prescription and medical examination report
dated 18th June, 2022 shows that the opposite party No.2 voluntarily
agreed to terminate her pregnancy by medicine and she was
explained by the Medical Officer regarding the risks that might be
incurred by her, the allegation under Section 313 of the Indian Penal
Code prima facie cannot stand.
Having heard the learned advocate for the petitioners this Court
is of the view that the instant revision can be disposed of here and
now with the assistance of learned advocate for the State of West
Bengal.
Ms. Baisali Basu, P.P.-in-charge is requested to assist this
Court.
I have heard the learned advocates for the petitioners and the
learned P.P.-in-charge.
The instant revision is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner
No.3 to produce a copy of the instant revision to the Investigating
Officer within three days from this date. The Investigating Officer
shall verify the medical reports of the opposite party No.2/de facto
complainant contained at page 36 (annexure P-2) and page 40
(annexure - P3) and will independently ascertain as to whether a case
under Section 313 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the
petitioners or not.
If no such case is made out, investigation of Golf Green Police
Station Case No.92 of 2022 shall be proceeded with following the
decision of Arnesh Kumar versus State of Bihar.
Till the date of ascertainment of the application as to whether
prima facie case under Section 313 of the Indian Penal Code has been
made out against the petitioners or not, no coercive step shall be
taken against the petitioner No.3.
The petitioners are at liberty to act on the server copy of this
order.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!