Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6262 Cal
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2022
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
CRR 2827 of 2022
Sunil Jaiswal.
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
For the petitioner : Mr. Arka Pratim Chowdhury, Adv.
Mr. Sunny Nandy, Adv.
Mr. Subha Pathak, Adv.
Heard on : 05.09.2022
Judgment On : 05.09.2022.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The petitioner being the accused in connection with
Bidhannagar Cyber Crime Police Station Case No.58 of 2022 under
Sections 420/468 of the Indian Penal Code with added Sections
384/500/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code presently pending before
the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bidhannagar being
G.R. Case No.400 of 2022 has prayed for quashing of the said
proceeding on the ground that petitioner was the employer of the de-
facto complainant/opposite party No.2. After the opposite party No.2
was terminated from service, she has lodged a false complaint against
the petitioner.
I have gone through the entire record. I have also heard the
learned Advocate for the petitioner. I do not find any reason to
entertain the instant revision.
However, the instant revision is disposed of directing the
Investigating Officer to serve notice under Section 41A of the Code of
Criminal Procedure to the petitioner for interrogation. Prior to such
interrogation, the Investigating Officer shall not take any coercive
step against the petitioner.
The instant revision, is, thus, disposed of.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Mithun De/ A.R. (Ct).
Sl No.110..
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!