Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7291 Cal
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2022
S/L 41
31.10.2022
Court No.652
SD
SA 459 of 1990
With
CAN 3 of 2022
Rashid Ali Khan
Vs.
Sk. Aminuddin, since deceased, represented by his heirs and
legal representative, Sk. Unus Hossain & Ors.
Mr. Khairul Alam
... for the Appellant.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that he has served notice upon the respondents.
Respondents are not represented.
The appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment
and decree dated July 22, 1989. The appellant states that the
predecessor-in-interest of the applicant/petitioner, namely, Sk.
Jalaluddin, the defendant no.2 died on May 1, 2015 leaving
behind the present applicants as his only heirs and legal
representatives.
The appellant further submits that no summons were
served upon their predecessor-in-interest that is the defendant
no.2 when the said suit was heard and decided. He further
submits that since this is a suit for partition, the applicants are
the necessary parties in the instant appeal and the appeal is
required to be disposed of in their presence.
He further submits that they came to know for the first
time about the suit on October 18, 2019.
Considering the facts and circumstances and the nature
of the case involved in the present proceeding, let the
applicants be added as a party in this appeal.
Department is directed to incorporate the necessary
corrections.
Accordingly, CAN 3 of 2022 is disposed of.
Let the second appeal appear in the second week of
January 2023.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!