Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7870 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2022
28.11.2022
Ct. 30 Sd./1 CRR 608 of 2020
Mr. Aniket Mitra ..For the petitioner.
Ms. P. Saha ..For the State.
A letter has been filed by the learned counsel for
the petitioner stating that they do not want to proceed
with this case any further and the matter may be
dismissed for non-prosecution.
The present revisional application was against a
part of the judgment dated 14.1.2020 passed by the
learned Special Judge, Electricity Act, Krishnagr, Nadia
directing the initiation of proceedings under section 344
of the Cr.P.C.
As there is no representation on behalf of the State
in this case, Ms. Puspita Saha, learned advocate present
in Court is appointed to represent the State.
Let her appointment be regularized by the learned
Public Prosecutor, High Court, Calcutta.
Considering the nature of the case and the prayer
made by the petitioner revisionist himself, the criminal
revision is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court for
information and the learned counsel for the State is
directed to inform the concerned authority about the
disposal of this case.
( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!