Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7807 Cal
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2022
24.11.2022
Ct.33
cm
(4)
CRR 2864 of 2014
With
CRAN 1 of 2022
With
CRAN 2 of 2022
Ramkrishna Adhikary
Vs.
Pankaj Nandi & Anr.
Mr. Soumik Ganguli
Mr. Sayan Roy
.... for the petitioner.
Mr. Malay Bhattacharyya
Ms. Sudipa Sengupta
.... for the O.P. 1
Being aggrieved by the order and judgment
dated 24th July, 2014 in Criminal Appeal No.21 of
2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bankura, the
instant revisional application had been filed by the
applicant. The learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Bishnupur in C. Case No. 75C of 2005
under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
has sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment of 20
days and to pay compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- only.
The said order was upheld by the learned Sessions
Judge, Bankura as aforesaid.
When the matter came up for hearing, the
learned advocate for the petitioner submitted the
parties have intended to amicably settle the dispute
out of court and the petitioner has agreed to pay Rs.
2
1,50,000/- by dint of bank draft bearing No. 560362
dated 17.09.2022. In another revisional application
being CRR 2849 of 2014 between the same parties,
similar issue has been proposed to be settled. Learned
advocate for the petitioner further submits that a Bank
draft of Rs. 30,000/- bearing No. 560364 dated
19.09.2022 has been prepared by the petitioner as an
additional amount to be paid with regard to both the
matters as aforesaid which has been accepted by the
respondent No.1.
The petitioner and the opposite party No.1 has
filed a separate affidavit to this effect that the matter
has been amicably settled between them and the
opposite party No.1 being the de-facto complainant, is
not willing to continue with the pending proceedings
and prayed for appropriate order to set aside the
judgment and order passed by the learned Sessions
Judge, Bankura in Criminal Appeal No.21 of 2013 and
the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Bishnupur in C. Case No. 75C of 2005 under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in terms of the
amicable settlement arrived between the parties.
According to Section 147 of the N.I. Act
notwithstanding anything contained in the Cr. P.C.,
every offence punishable under N.I. Act shall be
compoundable.
According to Section 320(6) Cr.P.C., the High
Court or Court of Sessions while exercising its powers
of revision under Section 401 Cr. P.C. may allow any
person to compound any offence, which such person is
competent to compound under this Section. When the
composition of offence under the Section is made, it
shall have the effect of an acquittal of the accused with
whom the offence has been compounded under Section
320(8) of Cr.P.C.
In view of the compromise, the conviction and
sentence passed by the Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Bishnupur in C. Case No. 75C of 2005
under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
which was upheld by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Bankura
in Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2013 are set aside. The
petitioner i.e. Ramkrishna Adhikary is acquitted
accordingly and set at liberty.
This criminal revision application being CRR
2864 of 2014 along with CRAN 1 of 2022 and CRAN 2
of 2022 are disposed of as above.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this
order duly downloaded from the official website of this
court.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!