Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7703 Cal
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2022
21.11.2022 S/L No.23 KS
C.R.R. 1688 of 2021 Lipi Sarkar & Anr.
-Vs.-
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Sujoy Sarkar Md. Musharraf Alam Sk.
Mr. Aslam Khan ..... For the Petitioners Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta Md. Kutubuddin Mr. Santanu Deb Roy .....For the State Mr. S. S. Roy Mr. Amarendra Chakraborty Mr. Arghya Banerjee .....For the O.P. No.2
The present revisional application has been preferred challenging the
continuance of the proceedings arising out of English Bazar Police Station Case
No.412 of 2018 dated 4.5.2018. In this case, on completion of investigation
charge-sheet was submitted before the Jurisdictional Court and the summary
of allegations involved is that the present petitioner who is an accused
pursuant to an understanding/agreement performed his work and even after
performing his work, he did not receive any payment and a cheque was issued
which on being presented with the bank 'dishonoured'. The de facto
complainant initiated a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act and also the present case. It has been contended that the present petitioner
prior to registration of English Bazar P.S. Case No.412 of 2018 dated 04.05.2018
informed the English Bazar Police Station on or about 19.03.2018 that a cheque
of Rs.30,00,000/- was being unscrupulously used which was stolen and the
number of the cheque is "Cheque No.181779" dated 17.03.2018. The allegation
was against one Bharat Saha who is the opposite party no.2 in the instant case.
Having regard to the peculiarity of the facts that the police authorities
without unearthing the truth submitted charge-sheet in both the cases.
Prudence do not satisfy that in both the cases charge sheet cannot be submitted
and a person is to be held responsible in one of the cases.
In view of the fact that English Bazar Police Station Case no.249/18
dated 19.03.2018 was registered earlier, I direct that all the materials collected
including the charge-sheet submitted in connection with English Bazar Police
Station Case No.412 of 2018 dated 04.05.2018 be placed before the one and the
same Court. Learned Magistrate will frame charges in both the cases and fix
date on the same day one after the other so that the trial of the cases may
proceed parallely. In case in course of the proceeding, it appears to the
Learned Magistrate that one of the case has progressed and the other case has
lagged behind so far as collection of evidence is concerned, in that case,
Learned Magistrate would stop delivery of the judgment in respect of the case
which has proceeded. Complete the evidence/trial of the other case and
deliver judgment of both the cases on one and the same date.
However, as the case relates to documents, learned Magistrate would
exercise his jurisdiction in case prayers are advanced under Section 205 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure.
With the aforesaid observation, C.R.R. 1688 of 2021 is disposed of.
Pending applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
All parties are directed to act on the server copy of this order
downloaded from the official website of this Hon'ble Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!