Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7657 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2022
S/L 9 18.11.2022
Sourav CO 3478 of 2011 With IA No: CAN 1 of 2017 (Old No: CAN 6769 of 2017)
Madan Mohan Das & Anr.
Vs.
Smt. Sipra Dutta nee Roy & Ors.
Mr. Sourav Sen ...for the petitioners.
Mr. Sourav Sen, learned advocate for the petitioner is
present. None appears on behalf of the opposite parties.
It reveals that on 16.08.2017 the hearing of the instant
revisional application was concluded but judgment could not
be pronounced. It is submitted by Mr. Sen, learned advocate
for the petitioner that for effective disposal of the instant
revisional application service be effected upon the opposite
parties as well as upon the learned advocate for the opposite
parties afresh.
In view of such, let the matter be listed on 05.01.2023.
The petitioner is hereby directed to cause service of
notices afresh along with the server copy of this order upon
the opposite party nos. 1 to 5 under registered post with
Acknowledgement Due. Learned advocate for the petitioner
is further requested to intimate the learned advocate for the
opposite parties preferably by issuing a written notice.
Affidavit-of-service has to be filed in the meantime or
on the adjourned date.
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!