Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7583 Cal
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2022
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
C.R.R. 2052 of 2022
Lokman Sapui
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors..
For the petitioner : Mr. Mukteswar Maity, Adv.
Ms. Manika Sarkar, Adv.
For the State : Mr. P.K.Datta, APP
Mr. Santanu Deb Roy, Adv.
Heard on : 16.11.2022
Judgment On : 16.11.2022.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
This is an application for expeditious disposal of G.R. Case
No.1865/ 2016 arising out of Kashipur Police Station Case No. 81 of
2016 dated 6th March, 2016 under Sections 420/406/120B/347/34 of
the Indian Penal Code, pending before the learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate at Baruipur.
It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that
in the aforesaid case charge-sheet was submitted in the year 2019.
Charge against the accused person was framed on 31 st October, 2019.
Unfortunately enough, till date though more than 2 years have
elapsed, prosecution has not been able to produce even a single
witness in the Trial Court.
Considering the nature of allegation and the submission made
in the instant revision, this Court is of the view that the instant
revision can be disposed of with the assistance of the learned Public
Prosecutor-in-Charge. Therefore, Mr. P.K.Datta, learned Public
Prosecutor-in-Charge is requested to assist this Court on behalf of the
opposite party No.1.
Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties and on
careful perusal of the entire materials on record, it appears that only
on 21st April, 2022 the case record was transferred to the 2nd Court of
learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Baruipur for disposal.
The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate received the case
record on 13th May, 2022 and next date was fixed on 20 th June, 2022
for appearance of the accused persons. Subsequent orders have not
been annexed with the instant revision.
Be that as it may, it is not a happy situation where the accused
persons were implicated in the year 2016 and till date they are
loitering in the Court premises without any effective trial. It is
submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that there are
only 4 witnesses to be examined during trial by the learned
Magistrate.
Under such circumstances, the instant revision is disposed of
with the expectation that the learned Magistrate shall take all
endeavour to commence trial of the case within one month from the
date of communication of this order and conclude examination of
charge-sheeted witnesses within 3 months thereafter.
It is also directed that the learned Magistrate shall come to the
logical conclusion of the case (G.R. No.1865 of 2016) within one
month after examination of the witnesses, examination of the accused
under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and examination
of Defence Witnesses, if any.
The petitioner shall act on the server copy of the order.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be
supplied to the party subject to compliance with all requisite
formalities.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Mithun De/ A.R. (Ct).
Sl No.38.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!