Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2830 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2022
OD 15
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
WPO/177/2019
WITH
WPA/11842/2019
SUMANA BHOWMICK
VS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble Justice SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 22nd November, 2022.
APPEARANCE:
Mr. Debashis Banerjee,Adv.
Mr. Shuvanil Chakraborty,Adv.
....for the petitioner.
Ms. Sonal Shah,Adv.
Mr. Kushagra Shah,Adv.
...for respondent no. 3
The Court :- When the matter is called on for hearing, it transpires from
the order sheet that the same had been heard at length and the hearing had
been concluded before the Hon'ble Justice Lapita Banerji, a Co-ordinate Bench.
At that juncture, it was apparently discovered that the matter was
initially marked as "heard in part" by this Bench, for which, even after conclusion of the hearing, the said learned Bench released the matter for being
heard by this Bench.
However, since the matter was heard in part by this Bench long back
and, for the ends of propriety and justice, it would only be suitable if the same
reaches its logical conclusion before the Bench where it was heard
conclusively, the matter is released from my list with liberty to the parties to
seek an assignment before the Bench of the Hon'ble Justice Lapita Banerji,
which concluded hearing in the matter.
Let the 'heard in part" marking by this Bench be treated as cancelled.
The Hon'ble the Chief Justice is requested to consider whether the matter
ought to be assigned to the single Bench of the Hon'ble Justice Lapita Banerji
for conclusion of hearing and passing judgment.
(SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
s.chandra
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!