Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohan Chandra Mondal @ Mohan ... vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 2537 Cal

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2537 Cal
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2022

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Mohan Chandra Mondal @ Mohan ... vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 5 May, 2022
 05.05.2022
Court No. 19
Item no.14
   CP
                                 WPA No. 3579 of 2022

                        Mohan Chandra Mondal @ Mohan Mondal
                                        Vs.
                           The State of West Bengal & ors.


               Mr. Debabrata Karan
               Ms. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya)
               Mr. Debopriyo Karan
                                                ....for the petitioner.

               Mr. Himadri Sikhar Chakraborty
               Ms. Debdooti Dutta

                                                ....for the State.



                       The   petitioner   was   engaged    as   a   'Saha-

               anuprerak (VT)' in the Haturia - I Gram Panchayat

               with effect from January 1, 1997. It is not in dispute

               that his name had appeared in the approved list of

               Saha-anuprerak issued by the Additional District

               Magistrate (Dev), Howrah dated June 2, 2004. The

               petitioner was thereafter disengaged sometime in

               2013.          Although          the        order        of

               disengagement/discontinuation          of the petitioner is

               not in the records of the Block Development Office,

               Bagnan, Howrah, the petitioner himself submits that

               such disengagement took place sometime in 2013.

                       The writ petition has been filed for an order of

               appointment of the petitioner to any group - D post

               under the Department of Panchayat and Rural

               Development, Government of West Bengal and for
                                    2




payment of remuneration on the basis of memo dated

April 23, 2010 for the period between the date of

issuance     of     the   said     memo         till   the    date    of

disengagement of the petitioner.

       The        District    Mass        Education          Extension

Officer,   Howrah            has       intimated       the     District

Magistrate,       Howrah       that       the     Continuing         the

Education     Programme,           under        which    the    Saha-

anupreraks were engaged had been discontinued

sometime in 2009.

      The learned advocate for the State respondents

has also relied upon on a Division Bench judgment

of this court, passed on January 18, 2019 in WP

25879 (W) of 2018 in order to substantiate that the

Division Bench had noted that the scheme under

which the petitioner had been appointed had been

discontinued long ago. The association of Saha-

anupreraks had moved this court by filing a public

interest litigation for payment of remuneration and

other reliefs. The writ petition was dismissed. The

special leave petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble

Apex Court with liberty to the parties to file

individual grievances before the High Court.

Admittedly, the petitioner was engaged in a

project. The purpose of such engagement was to

arrange periodical training in literacy centres. The

project under which such engagement was made was

discontinued on and from September 30, 2009.

Thus, the petitioner has not been working as a Saha-

anuprerak since discontinuation of the project. If the

panchayat authorities continued with the service of

the petitioner in the said office of the gram panchayat

between October 2009 till the date of disengagement

allegedly in 2013, the same must have been a private

arrangement between the gram panchayat and the

petitioner and such arrangement would not vest any

right upon the petitioner to be appointed under any

group - D post.

Moreover, the petitioner is 55 years old and

has crossed the age bar to appear in any selection

process to be held under the state Government or its

departments.

The petitioner has approached this court after

9 years from the date of his disengagement seeking a

mandamus upon the respondents to appoint the

petitioner in a post under the government or local

bodies.

The writ petition cannot be entertained for the

reasons as aforesaid. The petitioner does not have a

vested legal right to be appointed. The engagement of

the petitioner to a particular post for a project was

discontinued in 2009. The engagement of the

petitioner by the panchayat authorities after such

project was stopped is also not fortified by any

documents.

The writ petition is disposed of without any

orders.

With regard to the applicability of the circular

dated April 23, 2010, this court is of the view that

the said circular could not be given retrospective

effect as the project under which the petitioner had

been engaged was discontinued in September, 2009.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Parties are to act on the server copy of this

order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter