Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tax vs M/S. Rei Agro Limited
2022 Latest Caselaw 777 Cal/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 777 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2022

Calcutta High Court
Tax vs M/S. Rei Agro Limited on 7 March, 2022
OD-26

                            ITAT/416/2017
               IA No.GA/2/2017 (Old No. GA/3804/2017)

                   IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                 Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax)
                           ORIGINAL SIDE


                                   PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
                                   TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA

                                             -Versus-

                                   M/S. REI AGRO LIMITED


                                                               Appearance:
                                              Mr. Debasish Chaudhuri, Adv.
                                                     ...for the appellant.


    BEFORE:
    The Hon'ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM

-And-

The Hon'ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Date : 7th March, 2022.

The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under

Section 260A of the Income Tax, 1961 (the 'Act' in brevity) is

directed against the order dated 31st March, 2017 passed by the

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "C" Bench, Kolkata (in short the

'Tribunal') in ITA Nos.152 and 153/Kol/2014 for the assessment

years 2010-11 and 2011-12.

The revenue has raised the following substantial

question of law for consideration:

i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "C" Bench, Kolkata has erred in law in

deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on account of delayed deposit of employees' contribution towards PF/ESI without considering CBDT's Circular No.22 of 2015 dated December 17, 2015 ?

ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "C" Bench, Kolkata has erred in law in holding that the disallowances under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 is to be in relating to the income which does not form a part of the total income and this can be done only by taking into consideration the investment which has given rise to this income which does not form part of the total income while as per Rule 8D, those investments are also to be taken income from which shall not form part of the total income ?

We have heard Mr. Debasish Chaudhuri, learned standing

counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue.

The second substantial question of law framed for

consideration is with regard to disallowance under Section 14A

of the Act read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. We

have perused the order passed by the tribunal which affirmed the

order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Central-II, Kolkata [CIT(A)]. Identical issue arose in the

assessee's own case for the assessment year 2008-09 which was

decided in favour of the assessee by the CIT(A) and confirmed by

the tribunal. The revenue preferred appeal before this Court

and the appeal has been dismissed by judgment dated 9th April,

2014.

Thus, applying the decision of this Court, the said

issue was decided against the revenue and in favour of the

assessee, we find no ground to take a different view in the

matter as the said issue has already been decided in favour of

the assessee in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment

years. Accordingly, substantial question of law no.2 is

rejected.

So far as the first substantial question of law is

concerned, we note that identical issue has been entertained by

this Court in other appeals filed by the revenue and appeals

have been admitted as well. However, in the instant case, we

find the tax liability in so far as the disallowance of payment

of Provident Fund and ESI is far below the threshold limit in

both the assessment years which would prevent the

appellant/Department from pursuing this appeal. However, taking

note of the fact that similar substantial question of law has

already been admitted in other cases, we leave this question of

law open to be decided in an appropriate case.

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is

dismissed. Substantial question of law no.2 is answered against

the revenue and substantial question of law no.1 is left open as

we have dismissed the appeal against the revenue on the said

issue on the ground of low tax effect.

Consequently, the connected application for stay being

IA No.GA/2/2017 (Old No.GA/3804/2017) also stands closed.

(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)

(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

As/RS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter