Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1092 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2022
W.P.A. 3800 of 2018
94. 08.03.2022
BD Ct.15
(Through Video Conference)
Biswanath Singha
-vs-
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Shankar Biswas
... for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaharlal De
Mr. Shamim Ul Bari
... for the State
The writ petition is taken up for hearing in
presence of learned advocates representing the writ
petitioner and the State respondents. However, the
Baidyabati Municipality is not represented today.
It has been argued on behalf of the
petitioner that though petitioner was appointed in
the post of clerk with effect from 2nd April, 1991
and subsequently petitioner was placed in the
regular scale of pay with effect from 1st January,
1997 till date the approval of appointment has not
been finalized with regard to the service rendered
by the petitioner.
The Director of Local Bodies, Government of
West Bengal, vide order dated 29th December, 2017
has refused the prayer of regularisation of the
petitioner in the post of clerk.
However, Mr. Biswas, learned advocate,
during course of hearing relied upon an order of
Division Bench dated 19th March, 2021 passed on
an intra Court appeal being MAT 65 of 2021 which
according to the petitioner comes in his aid.
Mr. Jaharlal De, learned advocate,
representing the State respondents has prayed for
time to come prepared in view of the Judgment
delivered by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 19th
March, 2021 as referred to above.
Mr. Biswas, learned advocate, representing
the petitioner is directed to serve notice upon the
learned advocate who represents the Baidyabati
Municipality by 10th March, 2022.
Hearing of this matter stands adjourned till
31st March, 2022 when it will appear under the
heading "Specially Fixed Hearing".
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!