Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3811 Cal
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2022
30.06.2022
KC(8)
M.A.T. 369 of 2022
Vikash Kumar Sahu
-versus-
State of West Bengal and Ors.
With
CAN 1 of 2022
With
CAN 2 of 2022
Mr. Sattwik Bhattacharya,
Mr. Ashutosh Bhattacharya...........For the appellant.
Mr. Amal Kumar Sen,
Mr. Jaladhi Das............................For the State.
Mr. N.I. Khan,
Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee.........For the respondent
no. 8.
The appellant and the private respondent are
plying buses on inter-state stage-carriage permit. The
states involved are West Bengal and Jharkhand.
At the outset, we say that there is no dispute
regarding delineation of route or the length thereof.
The appellant/petitioner is plying buses from
Purulia, West Bengal to Jharia, Jharkhand via
Chandankiyari 12 Kms. of this route are in West
Bengal, whereas 93 Kms. fall in Jharkhand.
The private respondent is an operator between
Purulia, West Bengal to Barakar, Jharkhand via
Dhanbad. The distance is 136 Kms. out of which 23
Kms. fall in West Bengal and 113 Kms. in Jharkhand.
According to learned counsel for the appellant/
petitioner, the private respondent is to strictly follow the
route from Purulia to Barakar of 136 Kms. via
Chasmore. The complaint is that the private respondent
instead of following his allocated route is trenching
upon the route of the appellant/petitioner from Purulia
to Jharia. The private respondent, according to the
appellant/petitioner, is plying buses between Purulia to
Barakar via Chandankiyari. The distance of this route is
only 105 Km.s.
It is submitted on behalf of the private respondent
that he is entitled to take this route of 105 Km.s.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we
are of the opinion that the Principal Secretary,
Transport Department, Government of West Bengal
should determine the exact route to be followed by the
appellant/petitioner and the private respondent in
plying vehicles between Purulia to Barakar via Dhanbad
and between Purulia to Jharia.
After such determination, the principal secretary
will also determine whether the private respondent is
plying vehicles in breach of a sanctioned route or
permit. If it is found that such breach is being
committed by the private respondent, suitable
directions will be made by the principal secretary so
that there is strict adherence to the approved route by
the parties. The principal secretary will take the
decision within three months from date of
communication of this order after hearing all the
interested parties, including the appellant/petitioner
and the private respondent and by a reasoned order.
The impugned judgment and order is modified to
the above extent.
The appeal (M.A.T. 369 of 2022) and the
connected applications (CAN 1 of 2022 and CAN 2 of
2022) are disposed of.
(I.P. MUKERJI, J.)
(SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!