Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4842 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2022
28.07.2022
sayandeep
Sl. No. 04
Ct. No. 05
WPA 16269 of 2022
Shibu Dey
-Versus-
CESC Limited & Anr.
Mr. Bidyut Kr. Halde
Mr. Indranil Halder
..... for the petitioner
Mr. Debanjan Mukherjee
....for the CESC Limited
The petitioner prays for a direction on the
respondent Licensee to reconnect the electricity supply
to the petitioner and to quash the provisional and final
orders of assessment dated 22.6.2022 and 28.6.2022.
According to learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, the supply of electricity was disconnected by
CESC (Licensee) on 26.2.2022. Counsel further submits
that the petitioner filed an application for anticipatory
bail which was granted by a Division Bench on
13.7.2022 directing the petitioner to pay 50% of the
final assessment bill. The petitioner disputes the
provisional and final orders of assessment as well as the
absence of notice before disconnection of the electricity
supply.
Learned counsel appearing for the Licensee
Company submits that an outstanding amount of Rs.
72,519/- remains to be paid by the petitioner and that
the electricity line will be reconnected only upon full
payment. Counsel appearing for the parties have relied
on decisions in support of their contentions.
Upon hearing learned counsel, section 126 of The
Electricity Act, 2003, provides for assessment by the
Assessing Officer in case of unauthorised use of
electricity and the charges to be paid by the person who
has benefitted by such unauthorised use. Section
126(4) provides that any person served with the order of
provisional assessment may accept such assessment
and deposit the assessed amount with the Licensee
within 7 days of service of such provisional assessment
order. Section 127 provides for appeal to the Appellate
Authority where a person may challenge the final order
made under Section 126 within 30 days from the date
of order to the Appellate Authority. Section 127(2)
requires deposit of half of the assessed amount with the
Licensee along with the appeal. The third proviso to
Section 135(1A) of the Act also provides for
deposit/payment of the assessed amount in accordance
with the provisions of the Act.
Therefore, the statutory provisions indicate that
there is no scope for reconnection upon payment of 50%
of the assessed amount. The only provision which
envisages 50% is Section 127 where the persons
aggrieved may prefer an appeal upon payment of half of
the assessed amount.
In Santosh Agarwal vs. The CESC Limited (WPA
No. 18448 of 2021), a learned Judge of this Court held
that a consumer is not entitled to get restoration of
connection upon payment of 50% or any other fraction
of the total assessed amount. This judgment was
affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court by order
dated 5.5.2022 where the Division Bench also relied on
Regulation 6.4 of the West Bengal Electricity Regulatory
Commission (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations,
2013. Regulation 6.4 provides for payment of the
assessed amount by a consumer after being served with
the order of provisional or final assessment. The
Division Bench agreed with the view taken by the
learned Judge that the reconnection of electricity
cannot be made on deposit of 50% of the assessed
amount.
The orders shown on behalf of the Licensee are of
December, 2021 and May/June, 2022 which are more
recent in point of time compared to the orders of a
Coordinate Bench of February, 2021. Counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner has not placed any
order of the Appeal Court where the view taken by
another learned Single Judge that reconnection may be
made upon payment of 50% of the amount was
confirmed.
WPA 16269 of 2022 is accordingly disposed of
with liberty to the petitioner to pay the balance amount
as indicated in Annexure P-5 of the writ petition or the
entire assessed amount as the case may be, to the
respondents within a period of 7 days or earlier. The
respondents shall reconnect the electricity supply to the
petitioner within 48 hours from the date on which the
outstanding amount is paid by the petitioner to the
respondent Licensee. The petitioner is also at liberty to
approach the Appellate Authority if the petitioner is
entitled to do so under the provisions of the 2003 Act.
Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if
applied for, be supplied to the parties upon fulfillment
of requisite formalities
(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!