Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4265 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2022
(02)
15.07.2022
(p.jana)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
CO No. 1689 of 2022
Kishan Lal Agarwal
-versus-
HRG TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED
Mr. Rajarshi Dutt,
Mr. VVV Sastry,
Mr. Tridib Bose,
Mr. Sourav Roy
... for the petitioner/plaintiff/decree holder.
Mr. Kushal Chatterjee,
Mr. Abir Lal Chakravorti,
... for the opposite party/respondent/
judgement debtor.
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the
petitioner be kept with the record.
The opposite party has suffered an ex-parte
decree of eviction passed in a suit being Title Suit No.
686 of 2018.
An application for setting aside the said ex-
parte decree being Misc. Case No. 54 of 2021 is
pending before the 2nd Court of learned Civil Judge
(Senior Division), Barasat, District-24 Parganas (North).
In the said misc. case, the learned Trial Judge
by the order dated September 30, 2021 has stayed the
further proceedings of the Execution Case being Title
Execution Case No. 2 of 2019 levied to execute the said
ex parte decree of eviction and by the order dated May
21, 2022 has disposed of the application filed by the
decree-holder for payment of the occupational charges
by directing the judgment-debtor to pay the said
charges at the rate of contractual rent i.e. Rs. 33,000/-
per month.
The decree-holder in the present application
under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is
challenging both the aforesaid orders.
The grievance of the decree-holder is that the
amount of Rs. 33,000/- per month is disproportionate
with the current market rate of rent prevailing in the
area where the suit property is situated.
The suit property since was let out in the year
2013 for three years at the rate of rent of Rs. 33,000/-
per month, this Court though on a conservative
assessment, fixes it at the rate of Rs. 50,000/- per
month payable from the date of said ex-parte decree,
i.e. January 24, 2019.
Mr. Rajarshi Dutta, learned advocate for the
decree-holder submits that his client since is in dire
need of money for his treatment, he may be allowed to
withdraw a portion of the arrear occupational charges
calculated at the rate of Rs. 33,000 per month, which
is to the tune of Rs. 13.86 lakh (Thirteen lakhs and
eighty six thousand rupees only) and also the current
occupational charges at the said rate.
Mr. Kushal Chatterjee, learned counsel for the
judgment-debtor does not raise any serious objection to
the said prayer of Mr. Dutta.
The arrear occupational charges calculated for
the period from February 2019 to July 2022 comes to
Rs. 21 lakhs (Twenty one lakhs rupees only) out of
which the judgment-debtor is required to remit the said
sum of Rs. 13.86 lakhs to the bank account of the
decree-holder by three monthly installments of Rs. 5
lakhs, Rs. 4.86 lakhs and Rs. 4 lakhs within the month
of July, 2022, August, 2022 and September, 2022
respectively and also to remit a sum of Rs. 33,000/-
per month, being a part of current occupational
charges of Rs. 50,000/- to the said bank account of the
decree-holder within the 7th of each succeeding month
for which it falls due.
The learned advocate on record of both the
parties namely, Mr. Sourav Roy and Mr. Abir Lal
Chakravorti shall open a joint bank account with any
Nationalized Bank, wherein the judgment-debtor shall
deposit the rest of the said arrear occupational charges,
within August, 2022 and shall also deposit the rest
part of the current occupational charges i.e. Rs.
17,000/- per month in the said account, within the 7th
of each succeeding month for which it falls due.
There shall be an unconditional stay of the
Execution Case No. 2 of 2019 pending before the 2nd
Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Barasat,
District- 24 Parganas (North) till the end of the month
of September, 2022 and in the event the aforesaid
payments/deposits are made within the stipulated
time, the said stay shall continue till the disposal of the
Misc. Case No. 54 of 2021.
In the event of any default in compliance of any
part of this order, the said stay shall be automatically
vacated without any reference to this Court and the
decree would be executable at once.
The learned Trial Judge is requested to expedite
the disposal of the misc. case and in doing so shall not
grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the
parties.
C.O. 1689 of 2022 is disposed of with the above
terms without any order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to
compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!