Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4195 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2022
13.07.2022 (D/L-12) Ct.-18 (Susanta)
C.O. 442 of 2022
Sri Subhadeep Senapati (Minor)
-Vs-
Smt. Gita Payara & Ors.
Mr. Mukteswar Maity, ... For the Petitioner.
The order proposed to be passed in the
present revisional application under Article 227
of the Constitution of India would not cause any
prejudice to the opposite parties, as such, service
of notice of the present application upon the said
opposite parties is dispensed with.
The petitioner is a decree-holder of the
decree of eviction dated September 6, 2016.
The said decree was put into execution
giving rise to the connected O. Execution Case
no. 1 of 2017 before the 2nd Court of learned Civil
Judge (Junior Division), Contai, District- Purba
Medinipur.
The petitioner is complaining inordinate
delay in disposal of the said Execution Case.
It appears from the record that the said
Execution Case is still stuck at the stage of
issuing notice to the judgment-debtors.
The decree appears to have been put into
execution within two years from the date of the
decree, the Executing Court is requested to
consider whether the judgment-debtors are
entitled to notice of the said Execution case, in
view of the provision of Order XXI Rule 22 of the
Code of Civil Procedure and to bring the said
Execution Case to its logical conclusion in
accordance with law as expeditiously as possible,
preferably within six available effective working
months of the said Court from the date of
communication of the said order.
C.O. 442 of 2022 is disposed of with the
above terms without any order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order,
if applied for, be supplied to the party subject to
compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!