Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3931 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2022
35
jdt.
04.07.2022
jb.
W.P.A. 3668 of 2022
(Paritosh Chandra Roy vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.)
Mr. Surajit Roy
.... For the Petitioner
Mr. Sirsanya Bandyopadhyay
Ms. Tapati Samanta
.... For the State
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken
on record.
None appears for the 5th respondent despite
service.
The petitioner has prayed for re-determination of
the amount of compensation granted to him in view of
acquisition of his land in terms of judgment and decree
passed by the learned Land Acquisition Judge in Land
Acquisition Miscellaneous Case No. 195 of 2006. The
petitioner submits that the representation submitted by
the petitioner in this regard has not yet been
considered. The petitioner prays for a direction upon
the Authority to consider the representation at the
earliest.
Having considered the submissions made on
behalf of the parties and material on record, the writ
petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to
consider and dispose of the representation submitted by
the petitioner dated 25th June, 2010 within one month
from the date of communication of this order after
giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the
interested persons including the petitioner, in
accordance with law.
The decision taken by the Authority shall be
communicated to the petitioner within a week thereof.
W.P.A. 3668 of 2022 is thus disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Since no affidavit has been invited, allegations
contained in the writ petition shall be deemed not to
have been admitted.
Urgent certified website copy of the order, if
applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of
requisite formalities.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!