Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 95 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2022
17.01.2022
Item No.21
Ct. No.5
Aloke
W.P.A. 20722 of 2021
(Via Video Conference)
Koushik Kar
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Sreyasree Chaudhury
...for the petitioner
Ms. Tapati Samanta
...for the respondent no.4
Mr. Malay Singh Ms. Neelam Singh ... for the State
Affidavit of service filed in Court is kept with the
record.
The petitioner was an approved Laboratory Attendant
who retired from service on 31.05.2020. The petitioner
had completed all pension-related formalities. However,
the concerned authorities delayed and released the
gratuity amount and arrear pension amount on
17.11.2021. The petitioner herein seeks interest to be
paid on the gratuity amount and arrear pension amount
for the interim period of delay in receipt of the gratuity
amount and arrear pension amount. There is a
considerable delay in filing of the writ petition, which the
petitioner seeks to justify by stating that there is no
statutory period of limitation and neither parties have
suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557 (W) of
2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. State of West Bengal &
Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon the
Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of India Vs.
Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue
of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or
pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may
be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights
of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the petitioner, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of
West Bengal as also the concerned Tresury Officer to pay
interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the gratuity
amount and arrear pension amount calculated from
01.06.2020 till the date of payment. Such payment is to
be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of without
any order as to costs.
Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations made
in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied.
(Moushumi Bhattacharya J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!