Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 120 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2022
18.01.2022
ITEM NO. 4
Ct. No.4
Saswata
F.A.T. 230 of 2021
with
IA No. Can 1 of 2021
(Via video conference)
Sumita Pahari & Ors.
-vs-
Umapada Pahari & Ors.
Mr. R. N. Mahata
... for the appellants
Mr. Ganesh Shrivastava
Mr. Sukanta Das
... for the respondent nos. 1 & 2
In re : IA No. Can 1 of 2021
This is an application for injunction at the behest of
unsuccessful plaintiffs who have filed the instant appeal
challenging the judgment and decree dated 4th August
2021 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division),
1st Court, Paschim Medinipur in Title Suit No. 141 of 2012.
The suit for declaration that the deed of gift purportedly
executed by the predecessor of the present plaintiff in
favour of defendant no. 1 is an outcome of undue influence
and partition of the undivided properties. The suit came to
be dismissed on the ground that the other co-sharers of
some of the plots have not been made party. Furthermore,
the Trial Court found that the plaintiffs have not been able
to prove that the deed of gift is invalid. In the instant
application, it is alleged that taking advantage of the
dismissal of the suit, the respondent nos. 1 to 4 are
contemplating to deal with the property in favour of the
strangers and if they become successful, it would invite
cumbersome situation and complicate the issues by
bringing the outsiders.
It appears from the record that the order of status quo
with regard to possession, nature and character of the suit
property, except the property described in schedule 'B' and
'D' to the plaint was passed and ultimately the said interim
order was modified by the Division Bench of this Court in
FMA 2464 of 2013 to the extent that there shall be an
order of status quo as on date i.e., 13th March 2014 in
respect of the suit property with regard to the ownership,
possession and character. The said order was operative till
the dismissal of the suit.
It would be prudent that the order which continued
for a long time and remained operative till the suit was
alive is not extended when the appeal is filed against the
judgment and decree and the same being the continuation
of the lis.
Furthermore, the suit was dismissed on the non
impleadment of the necessary party. Though certain
findings were also made on the deed of gift which was
challenged therein, but we feel that the property must be
protected till the disposal of the instant appeal.
Accordingly, respondent nos. 1 to 4 as well as the
plaintiffs are directed to maintain status quo with regard to
ownership, nature and the possession of the suit properties
for a period of 8 weeks from date or until further orders,
whichever is earlier.
The appellants are directed to serve a copy of this
application upon respondent nos. 3 to 6 by speed post and
shall file affidavit of service on the returnable date.
The application is made returnable after 3 weeks.
In re : F.A.T. 230 of 2021
The appellants are directed to put in talabana,
requisites and written up notice forms for effecting service
of notice of appeal upon respondent nos. 3 to 6 within a
week from date.
Since respondent nos. 1 and 2 has entered
appearance by lodging caveat, office is directed to include
the vokalatnama, annexed with the caveat to have been
filed in the instant appeal and shall treat the appeal ready
as regards service so far as the aforesaid respondents are
concerned. Apart from the same, Mr. De, learned advocate
appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, waives the
service of notice of appeal upon his clients.
Let Lower Court's Record be called for through special
messenger at the cost of the appellants. Such cost shall be
put within a week from date. Upon deposit of special
messenger cost and after the arrival of Lower Court's
Record, office shall examine the same and if found
complete, shall put a note in the file and thereafter shall
serve the notice under Chapter IX Rule 12 of the Appellate
Side Rules upon the Advocate-on-Record of the appellants.
The appellants shall prepare eight copies of informal
paper books - printed, typewritten or cyclostyled, as the
case may be within a period of 6 weeks from date of service
of notice of arrival of Lower Court's Records and shall
include all the documents which form part of the record
and reflected in the judgment impuged in the instant
appeal.
All other formalities including the filing of Appellants'
declaration are dispensed with.
After the service having effected on the respondents
and upon filing of paper books, liberty to granted to the
parties to prayer for early listing of the matter.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be given to the parties on priority basis.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!