Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 869 Cal
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2022
Court No. 24 W.P.A. 2504 of 2022
25.02.2022 (via video conference)
(Item No. 50)
Shouvik Patra
(AB) VS
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Biswarup Biswas
Mr. Abhijit Basu
...... for the petitioner
Leave is granted to the learned advocate on record
of the petitioner to implead the District Inspector of
Schools (Primary Education), Purba Medinipur as party
respondent.
The formality of service of copy of the writ petition
upon the said respondent stands dispensed with as the
copy of the writ petition has already been served in the
office of the learned Government Pleader representing all
the State respondents.
The petitioner prays for compassionate
appointment. His father was a Primary School Teacher
who died in harness on 27th December, 2018. The
petitioner made an application for compassionate
appointment on 22nd December, 2020. The prayer of the
petitioner stood rejected by the order of the District Inspect
of Schools (Secondary Education), Purba Medinipur on 29th
November, 2021. The petitioner being aggrieved by the
same filed the present writ petition.
The petitioner assails the impugned order of
rejection on two grounds. First, the jurisdiction of the
authority to pass such an order and second, the method in
which the family income of the petitioner has been
assessed.
It has been submitted that the father of the
petitioner was a Primary School Teacher and according to
the provisions of the West Bengal Primary School Teacher
Recruitment Rules, 2001 as amended up to date the
District Inspect of Schools (Primary Education) is the
competent authority to take a decision with regard to
consideration of the application of the petitioner on
compassionate ground.
Rule 21 of the West Bengal School Service
Commission (Selection of Persons for Appointment to the
post of Non-Teaching Staff) Rules, 2009 mentions that the
School Service Commission, may subject to the other
provisions of this Rule recommend the name of a member
of the family of the Primary Teacher to the post of Clerk or
Group D staff on compassionate ground, when the name of
the family member is forwarded from the District Inspect of
Schools (Primary Education) concerned observing the
formalities specified in Rule 20.
In the present case, the impugned order has been
passed by the District Primary School Council (Secondary
Education) who did not have any role at the time of
consideration of the application made by the petitioner.
With regard to the computation of family income it
has been submitted that according to Schedule V of Rules
20 and 21 of the aforesaid Rules relating to the procedure,
manner of application and preparation of panel for
appointment on compassionate ground "Financial
hardship" in relation to income of a deceased teacher
consisting of up to five members in his family, shall mean
an amount of income less than the initial gross salary of
Group 'D' staff of the State Government at the material
point of time. For computation of income of such family,
an income of an amount earned by each family member
from any other sources than Provident Fund, Gratuity and
40% of Family Pension of the first seven years or upon the
attainment of 67 years of age of the deceased teacher had
he been alive, whichever is earlier at the material point of
time shall be taken into account.
It has been submitted that the family income that
has been computed was not in accordance with the
aforesaid provision.
None appears on behalf of the State respondents
despite service.
Prima facie, it appears that the District Inspector of
Schools (Secondary Education) ought not to have decided
the issue since the service relates to a Primary School
Teacher. The family income also apparently appears not to
have been computed in the manner as provided in the
Rules.
In view of the above, the impugned order of
rejection dated 29th November, 2021 is set aside. The
matter is remanded back to the District Inspector of
Schools (Primary Education), Purba Medinipur to consider
the matter afresh, strictly in accordance with the relevant
Rules at the earliest, but positively within a period of ten
weeks from the date of communication of a copy of this
order.
The said respondent shall pass a reasoned order
and communicate the same to the petitioner immediately
thereafter.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
Urgent certified photo copy of this judgment, if
applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on
compliance of usual legal formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!