Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 728 Cal
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2022
21.02.2022.
p.b.
Sl. No.23.
W.P.A. 1546 of 2022
(Through Video Conference)
Vishnu Engineering Corporation Vs.
Deputy Commissioner, Trade Tax & Anr.
Mr. Mainak Bose, Ms. Mou Saha.
........for the petitioner. Mr. Somnath Ganguli, Mr. Sukalpa Seal.
........for the DGGI.
Mr. Tapan Bhanja.
........for the UOI.
Mr. A. Ray,
Mr. T. M. Siddiqui,
Mr. D. Ghosh.
........for the State.
Heard learned advocate appearing for the parties.
Mr. Bose, learned advocate in support of his
contention that Section 75 Sub-Section (4) of the State
GST Act mandates affording an opportunity of hearing to
the person against whom an adverse decision is
contemplated even though that person may not have made
request for personal hearing, has relied on a decision of
the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court dated 4th
February, 2022 in the WRIT TAX No.1029 of 2021 (Bharat
Mint And Allied Chemicals Vs. Commissioner Commercial
Tax And 2 Others).
Mr. Ghosh, learned advocate appearing on behalf of
the State GST authority seeks time to consider this
judgment.
List this matter on 28th February, 2022.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!