Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank
2022 Latest Caselaw 578 Cal/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 578 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2022

Calcutta High Court
Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank on 21 February, 2022
OD - 5 & 6

                IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
               SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)
                         ORIGINAL SIDE

                     IA NO: GA/2/2021
                             IN
                       ITAT/17/2021
    PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, KOLKATA
                            VS.
               BANGIYA GRAMIN VIKASH BANK

                     IA NO: GA/1/2021
                             IN
                       ITAT/17/2021
    PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, KOLKATA
                            VS.
               BANGIYA GRAMIN VIKASH BANK


BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
              AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Date : February 21, 2022.

[Via Video Conference]

                                                         Appearance :
                                         Mr. Debasish Chaudhuri, Adv.
                                                   ... for the appellant

                                        Mr. Soumitra Chowdhury, Adv.
                                             Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv.
                                                      Mr. K. Roy, Adv.
                                              Mr. Binayak Gupta, Adv.
                                                 ... for the respondent

Re : IA No. GA/1/2021

The Court : We have heard Mr. Debasish Chaudhuri, learned

standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr.

Soumitra Chowdhury duly assisted by Mr. Avra Mazumder, Mr. K.

Roy, Mr. B. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.

There is a delay of 732 days in filing the appeal. The

respondent/assessee has filed affidavit-in-opposition objecting to the

condonation of delay. However, taking note of the fact that the order

passed by the Tribunal which is impugned before us is a

consequential order giving effect to an order passed under Section 263

of the Act, we exercise discretion and condone the delay in filing the

appeal. Hence, the petition for condonation of delay is allowed.

Re : ITAT 17 of 2021

This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the

Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act' for brevity) against the order dated

28th August, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "D"

Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No. 2219/Kol/2017 for the

assessment year 2010-11.

The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of

law for consideration :

a. Whether in the facts and in the circumstances of the

case and in law, Learned ITAT erred in holding that the

fresh order passed by the assessing officer under

Section 143/263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the

issue has become infructuous and upholding the order

of the CIT (A) in spite of the facts that the order the ITAT

in ITA No. 877/Kol/2015 dated 12-05-2017 has not

attained finality and appeal has been filed before the

Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta on this issue?

b. Whether the ITAT erred in law and in the facts of this

case in holding that the fresh order passed by the

assessing officer under Section 143/263 of the Income

Tax Act, 1961 on the issue has become infructuous and

upholding the order of the CIT (A) in spite of the facts

that the order the ITAT in ITA No. 877/Kol/2015 dated

12-05-2017 has not attained finality and appeal has

been filed before the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta on

this issue?

We have heard Mr. Debasish Chaudhuri, learned standing

counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. Soumitra

Chowdhury duly assisted by Mr. Avra Mazumder, Mr. K. Roy, Mr. B.

Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.

The order impugned before us is in an appeal filed by the

revenue arising out of an order passed by the assessing officer dated

3rd March, 2016. This order was for giving effect to an order passed by

the Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata - 14 exercising its

jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act. The substantive order

passed by the Tribunal is the order dated 12th May, 2017 in ITA No.

877/Kol/2015 which was decided in favour of the

respondent/assessee. The revenue preferred appeal against the said

order in ITAT No. 60 of 2018 which was dismissed by judgment dated

23.11.2021. As mentioned, the order impugned before us arises out of

consequential proceedings pursuant to the order passed under

Section 263 of the Act which order has been set aside and the same

has been confirmed by this Court in ITAT No. 60 of 2018 dated

23.11.2018. Therefore, we have to necessarily hold that the

substantial questions of law suggested do not arise in this case and

consequently, the appeal stands dismissed.

Connected application also stands dismissed.

(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)

(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

RS/GH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter