Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 290 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2022
C.O. 2163 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
Present:-
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE Kesang Doma Bhutia.
C.O. 2163 of 2021
Hasina Bubi
VS.
Sri Sibu Prasad Das & Anr.
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Partha Pratim Roy
For the Opposite Parties :- Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee,
Mr. Amal Kumar Saha,
Ms. Irish Paul,
Hearing concluded on :- 31.01.2022
Judgment on :- 03.02.2022
Kesang Doma Bhutia, J:- - The land lord being aggrieved by the
order granting permission to the tenant to repair the disputed tenanted
one room structure with verandah made of brick with tile roof by the
Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Chandernagore, Hooghly, in
Page 1 of 5
C.O. 2163 of 2021
Title Suit No. 319 of 2018 on 29.11.2021, in compliance of the direction
given by the Hon'ble High Court in C.O. No. 4195 of 2019 on
19.03.2021
has filed the present application under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India.
The facts necessary for determination of present revisional
application is that the opposite parties being the tenants of the
disputed structure have filed Title Suit being No. 319 of 2018 for
declaration and permanent injunction. The petitioner/landlord too has
filed an Eviction Suit against the present opposite parties and which is
also pending before the same Court. That in Title Suit No. 318 of 2018
the plaintiffs/tenants had filed an application for repair of the tenanted
structure based on local inspection report and which was allowed, but
due to resistance put by the landlord/defendant no repair work could
be carried out and as such the learned Court below had to direct police
to help the tenants to execute the repair works of the tenanted
structure by passing an order on 02.01.2020.
Being aggrieved by such order, the defendant/landlord preferred a
revision before the Hon'ble High Court being No. 4195 of 2019. The
Hon'ble coordinate bench of this High Court was pleased to allow the
repair work of the premises in question with a direction to the learned
Court below to get the repair work done in presence of advocate
commissioner to be appointed by the learned Court below or in
C.O. 2163 of 2021
presence of learned Advocate Commissioner who had already done local
inspection of the disputed tenanted structure. Learned Court below as
per the direction of the Hon'ble High Court and also keeping in view the
local inspection report of the commissioner allowed the
plaintiffs/tenants to carry out the repair works. Learned Court below by
passing the impugned order has allowed replacement of 200 pieces of
roof tiles with 25 pieces of motka, replacement of 50 tiles supporting
bamboo sticks, plastering of western side room with verandah and also
repair of the floor.
Now by filling the present revisional application the landlord had
alleged in the garb of repair the learned Court below has allowed the
tenant to carry out a new construction. He further submitted if the
tenant is allowed to carry out the nature of repair work as mentioned in
the impugned order then the eviction suit filed by the petitioner on the
ground the suit property is in dilapidated condition would be
infructuous. Therefore, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the
impugned order.
The institution of an eviction suit against opposite parties by the
present petitioner ipso facto prove that present petitioner admits that
opposite parties to be her tenants in respect of the disputed structure.
It is settled principle of law a tenant cannot be evicted from the
tenanted premises without due process of law. Therefore, this Court is
C.O. 2163 of 2021
of view so long the tenant is not evicted from the tenanted structure,
the tenant has every right to live in the tenanted structure suitable for
human habitation and with dignity.
From the report of the commissioner and impugned order it is
seen that photographs were produced by the Advocate Commissioner
who was appointed to hold local inspection of the disputed tenanted
premises and which show tiles are missing from some portion of the
roof and plastic sheet being used to cover the ceiling. The bamboos
supporting the ceiling are in rotten condition. There is a gap in between
the roof and the brick wall and tiles being stacked at the verandah. Two
pillars supporting the western wall are in tilted condition, the walls are
in cracked and in poor condition being aggravated by cyclone Amphan
and cyclone Yaas and there is immediate need of repair of the disputed
structure to make it habitable.
Therefore, keeping in view the condition of the disputed structure,
the nature of repair works which are required to be effected in the
disputed structure as ordered by the learned Court below do not appear
to be in the nature of a new construction as alleged by the learned
Advocate for the petitioner. Therefore, this Court does not find any
material irregularities in the impugned order. This Court does not find
any merit in the revisional application. Therefore, the same is
dismissed.
C.O. 2163 of 2021
Accordingly, C.O. No. 2163 of 2021 is dismissed. Connected
applications, if any, are disposed of.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
In view of the order made above Affidavits are not invited. Allegations
made shall be deemed to be denied.
There will be no order as to costs.
All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be
given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!