Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 287 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2022
03.02.2022
Sl. 10 (Via Video Conference)
Ct.No. 03
Amalranjan
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
FA 38 of 2009
With
CAN 4 of 2020
(Old 2530 of 2020)
Kanhaiya Lal Surana
Vs.
Smt. Angurbala Majumder & Ors.
Mr. Prabir Kumar Misra
Mr. Shibendra Nath Chattropadhyay
Mr. Priyam Misra
...for the respondents
Re: CAN 4 of 2020, Old CAN 2530 of 2020
The impugned judgment and decree was
made on 21st May, 2008 by the learned court
below. This appeal was filed in the same year.
The records say that on 10th February, 2009
an order was passed by this court, inter alia,
directing the appellant to file informal paper
books within 2 months from the date of service
of the notice of arrival of the lower court records.
In default of filing of such paper books, the
appeal would stand dismissed. Concurrently,
this court ordered stay of all further proceedings
in execution.
By this application (CAN 4 of 2020, Old CAN
2530 of 2020) the respondents pray for vacation
of the order of stay of execution of the eviction
decree.
None appears for the appellant.
We direct that this appeal and the
connected application appear in the list on 16th
February, 2022 in the same position.
On that day, the department will file a
report in this court stating whether the lower
court records have arrived, and if so, whether
the notice of arrival of the records was issued
and served on the appellant? Also, if such notice
was served whether the appellant has filed the
paper books in terms of the order dated 10th
February, 2009.
If the report of the department indicates
that in spite of arrival of records and due service
of notice of such arrival, the appellant has taken
no steps to file the paper books, on the next day
we would seriously consider dismissing the
appeal for non-prosecution.
The advocate on record for the respondents
will issue a notice to the appellant informing
them the gist of this order. He shall also
reiterate the prayer made by learned counsel for
the respondents in court that he would also be
praying for occupational charges to be paid by
the appellant for occupation of the subject
premises from the date of the decree.
( Aniruddha Roy,J. ) ( I. P. Mukerji,J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!